KGLLF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.04 (+66.67%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
56.63M
RGLSF
Price
$1.78
Change
-$0.02 (-1.11%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
226.49M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KGLLF vs RGLSF

Header iconKGLLF vs RGLSF Comparison
Open Charts KGLLF vs RGLSFBanner chart's image
KGL Resources
Price$0.10
Change+$0.04 (+66.67%)
Volume$34.5K
Capitalization56.63M
Regulus Resources
Price$1.78
Change-$0.02 (-1.11%)
Volume$450
Capitalization226.49M
KGLLF vs RGLSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KGLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGLSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KGLLF vs. RGLSF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGLLF is a Hold and RGLSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (KGLLF: $0.10 vs. RGLSF: $1.78)
Brand notoriety: KGLLF and RGLSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KGLLF: 153% vs. RGLSF: 8%
Market capitalization -- KGLLF: $56.63M vs. RGLSF: $226.49M
KGLLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $56.63M. RGLSF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $226.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KGLLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRGLSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KGLLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RGLSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both KGLLF and RGLSF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGLLF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGLSF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KGLLF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • RGLSF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGLSF is a better buy in the short-term than KGLLF.

Price Growth

KGLLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RGLSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGLSF($226M) has a higher market cap than KGLLF($56.6M). KGLLF YTD gains are higher at: 74.333 vs. RGLSF (33.835). KGLLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.43M vs. RGLSF (-3.65M).
KGLLFRGLSFKGLLF / RGLSF
Capitalization56.6M226M25%
EBITDA-3.43M-3.65M94%
Gain YTD74.33333.835220%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A11.1M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RGLSF: Fundamental Ratings
RGLSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGLLFRGLSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KGLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGLSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTCSX42.240.75
+1.81%
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth C
JIECX20.51N/A
N/A
JPMorgan International Equity C
CBARX48.53N/A
N/A
Calvert Balanced R6
UIVNX12.88N/A
N/A
MFS Intrinsic Value R2
WMKSX17.21N/A
N/A
WesMark Small Company Fund

KGLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGLLF has been loosely correlated with MKRIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KGLLF jumps, then MKRIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGLLF
1D Price
Change %
KGLLF100%
N/A
MKRIF - KGLLF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ULTHF - KGLLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+13.11%
FPRGF - KGLLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-40.63%
RGLSF - KGLLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
EULIF - KGLLF
9%
Poorly correlated
-7.62%
More

RGLSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGLSF and UAMY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGLSF and UAMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGLSF
1D Price
Change %
RGLSF100%
-1.11%
UAMY - RGLSF
32%
Poorly correlated
+6.26%
SRLZF - RGLSF
30%
Poorly correlated
-5.44%
LQRCF - RGLSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
AXVEF - RGLSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGLLF - RGLSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More