KGS
Price
$34.32
Change
+$0.45 (+1.33%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.12B
40 days until earnings call
MTTRF
Price
$8.91
Change
+$0.32 (+3.73%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

KGS vs MTTRF

Header iconKGS vs MTTRF Comparison
Open Charts KGS vs MTTRFBanner chart's image
Kodiak Gas Services
Price$34.32
Change+$0.45 (+1.33%)
Volume$1.1M
Capitalization2.12B
Mattr
Price$8.91
Change+$0.32 (+3.73%)
Volume$50.26K
CapitalizationN/A
KGS vs MTTRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KGS vs. MTTRF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGS is a Buy and MTTRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (KGS: $34.32 vs. MTTRF: $8.91)
Brand notoriety: KGS and MTTRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KGS: 123% vs. MTTRF: 254%
Market capitalization -- KGS: $2.12B vs. MTTRF: $0
KGS [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $2.12B. MTTRF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTTRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTTRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTTRF is a better buy in the long-term than KGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • KGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

KGS (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -0.38% price change this week, while MTTRF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +5.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

KGS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.92% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTTRF YTD gains are higher at: 1.829 vs. KGS (-14.087).
KGSMTTRFKGS / MTTRF
Capitalization2.12BN/A-
EBITDA441MN/A-
Gain YTD-14.0871.829-770%
P/E Ratio95.59N/A-
Revenue850MN/A-
Total Cash5.56MN/A-
Total Debt1.83BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTTRF: Fundamental Ratings
MTTRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
13
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
47
SMR RATING
1..100
78
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHDEX13.610.10
+0.74%
Cullen High Dividend Equity Retail
NPRTX47.19N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Inv
CDIVX12.25N/A
N/A
Copeland Dividend Growth Fund Class I
GURIX32.11N/A
N/A
NAA Risk Managed Real Estate Inst
PMJPX10.35N/A
N/A
PIMCO RAE US Small I-2

KGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGS has been closely correlated with AROC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KGS jumps, then AROC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGS
1D Price
Change %
KGS100%
+1.33%
AROC - KGS
85%
Closely correlated
+2.73%
USAC - KGS
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
NGS - KGS
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.52%
PUMP - KGS
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
BKR - KGS
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
More

MTTRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTTRF and AROC have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTTRF and AROC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTTRF
1D Price
Change %
MTTRF100%
+3.73%
AROC - MTTRF
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.73%
HAL - MTTRF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
TTI - MTTRF
28%
Poorly correlated
+4.22%
SLB - MTTRF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
KGS - MTTRF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
More