KGSSF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
SXNTF
Price
$0.31
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Ad is loading...

KGSSF vs SXNTF

Header iconKGSSF vs SXNTF Comparison
Open Charts KGSSF vs SXNTFBanner chart's image
Kingman Minerals
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$56K
CapitalizationN/A
Sixty North Gold Mining
Price$0.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$650
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
KGSSF vs SXNTF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
KGSSF vs. SXNTF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGSSF is a Hold and SXNTF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (KGSSF: $0.09 vs. SXNTF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: KGSSF and SXNTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KGSSF: 112% vs. SXNTF: 12%
Market capitalization -- KGSSF: $553.85K vs. SXNTF: $3.51M
KGSSF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $553.85K. SXNTF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KGSSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSXNTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KGSSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SXNTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both KGSSF and SXNTF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

KGSSF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.60% price change this week, while SXNTF (@Precious Metals) price change was -70.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.12% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SXNTF($3.51M) has a higher market cap than KGSSF($554K). SXNTF YTD gains are higher at: 125.000 vs. KGSSF (12.138). KGSSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -126.94K vs. SXNTF (-148.53K). KGSSF has more cash in the bank: 54.8K vs. SXNTF (51.3K). KGSSF (0) and SXNTF (0) have equivalent revenues.
KGSSFSXNTFKGSSF / SXNTF
Capitalization554K3.51M16%
EBITDA-126.94K-148.53K85%
Gain YTD12.138125.00010%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash54.8K51.3K107%
Total Debt104KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SXNTF: Fundamental Ratings
SXNTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
29
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

KGSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGSSF has been loosely correlated with HELOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KGSSF jumps, then HELOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGSSF
1D Price
Change %
KGSSF100%
-24.49%
HELOF - KGSSF
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IMRFF - KGSSF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RMETF - KGSSF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WKGFF - KGSSF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XPRCF - KGSSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SXNTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SXNTF and RVTI have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SXNTF and RVTI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SXNTF
1D Price
Change %
SXNTF100%
-68.95%
RVTI - SXNTF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GFIOF - SXNTF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGSSF - SXNTF
16%
Poorly correlated
-24.49%
GGAZF - SXNTF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VOXR - SXNTF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More