KGTFF
Price
$0.78
Change
+$0.13 (+20.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
10.95B
WVFC
Price
$12.21
Change
+$0.01 (+0.08%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
20.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KGTFF vs WVFC

Header iconKGTFF vs WVFC Comparison
Open Charts KGTFF vs WVFCBanner chart's image
Krung Thai Bank Public
Price$0.78
Change+$0.13 (+20.00%)
Volume$9.82K
Capitalization10.95B
WVS Financial
Price$12.21
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
Volume$3.6K
Capitalization20.31M
KGTFF vs WVFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KGTFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WVFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KGTFF vs. WVFC commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGTFF is a Hold and WVFC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (KGTFF: $0.78 vs. WVFC: $12.21)
Brand notoriety: KGTFF and WVFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KGTFF: 7% vs. WVFC: 157%
Market capitalization -- KGTFF: $10.95B vs. WVFC: $20.31M
KGTFF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $10.95B. WVFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $20.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $164.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KGTFF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWVFC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KGTFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WVFC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KGTFF is a better buy in the long-term than WVFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGTFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WVFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KGTFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WVFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WVFC is a better buy in the short-term than KGTFF.

Price Growth

KGTFF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WVFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGTFF($10.9B) has a higher market cap than WVFC($20.3M). WVFC has higher P/E ratio than KGTFF: WVFC (11.63) vs KGTFF (8.05). KGTFF YTD gains are higher at: 66.667 vs. WVFC (-3.460). WVFC has less debt than KGTFF: WVFC (114M) vs KGTFF (389B). KGTFF has higher revenues than WVFC: KGTFF (157B) vs WVFC (6.14M).
KGTFFWVFCKGTFF / WVFC
Capitalization10.9B20.3M53,695%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD66.667-3.460-1,927%
P/E Ratio8.0511.6369%
Revenue157B6.14M2,556,171%
Total CashN/A3.71M-
Total Debt389B114M341,228%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KGTFF vs WVFC: Fundamental Ratings
KGTFF
WVFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4933
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2182
SMR RATING
1..100
185
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4159
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2176
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KGTFF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WVFC (96) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that KGTFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WVFC’s over the last 12 months.

KGTFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WVFC (82) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that KGTFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WVFC’s over the last 12 months.

KGTFF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WVFC (85) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that KGTFF’s stock grew significantly faster than WVFC’s over the last 12 months.

KGTFF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as WVFC (59) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that KGTFF’s stock grew similarly to WVFC’s over the last 12 months.

KGTFF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WVFC (76) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that KGTFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WVFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGTFFWVFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KGTFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WVFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRRE8.50N/A
N/A
Blue Ridge Real Estate Co.
VMTHF0.52N/A
N/A
VENUS MEDTECH HANGZHOU INC.
GMBLP0.06N/A
N/A
Esports Entertainment Group, Inc.
SLLDY9.47-0.13
-1.35%
Sanlam Ltd.
MAWHY11.07-1.03
-8.51%
Man Wah Holdings, Ltd.

KGTFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KGTFF and INBC have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGTFF and INBC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGTFF
1D Price
Change %
KGTFF100%
N/A
INBC - KGTFF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
MBIN - KGTFF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
LOGN - KGTFF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.97%
KPCPF - KGTFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKKPF - KGTFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WVFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WVFC and LOGN have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WVFC and LOGN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WVFC
1D Price
Change %
WVFC100%
+0.08%
LOGN - WVFC
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.97%
CZNL - WVFC
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTFF - WVFC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFIC - WVFC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HFWA - WVFC
-7%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
More