KHTRF
Price
$4.42
Change
-$0.15 (-3.28%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
423.84M
MCUJF
Price
$0.82
Change
+$0.11 (+15.49%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
8.23M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KHTRF vs MCUJF

Header iconKHTRF vs MCUJF Comparison
Open Charts KHTRF vs MCUJFBanner chart's image
Knight Therapeutics
Price$4.42
Change-$0.15 (-3.28%)
Volume$600
Capitalization423.84M
Medicure
Price$0.82
Change+$0.11 (+15.49%)
Volume$113
Capitalization8.23M
KHTRF vs MCUJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KHTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCUJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KHTRF vs. MCUJF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KHTRF is a Hold and MCUJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (KHTRF: $4.42 vs. MCUJF: $0.82)
Brand notoriety: KHTRF and MCUJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KHTRF: 8% vs. MCUJF: 7%
Market capitalization -- KHTRF: $423.84M vs. MCUJF: $8.23M
KHTRF [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $423.84M. MCUJF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $8.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $63.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KHTRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCUJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KHTRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCUJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCUJF is a better buy in the long-term than KHTRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KHTRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCUJF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KHTRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCUJF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KHTRF is a better buy in the short-term than MCUJF.

Price Growth

KHTRF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а -3.28% price change this week, while MCUJF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was -1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +24.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +67.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (-1.18% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KHTRF($424M) has a higher market cap than MCUJF($8.23M). KHTRF has higher P/E ratio than MCUJF: KHTRF (62.66) vs MCUJF (11.51). MCUJF YTD gains are higher at: 31.484 vs. KHTRF (22.438). KHTRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 52M vs. MCUJF (1.45M). KHTRF has more cash in the bank: 116M vs. MCUJF (4.74M). MCUJF has less debt than KHTRF: MCUJF (1.09M) vs KHTRF (105M). KHTRF has higher revenues than MCUJF: KHTRF (385M) vs MCUJF (23.2M).
KHTRFMCUJFKHTRF / MCUJF
Capitalization424M8.23M5,149%
EBITDA52M1.45M3,586%
Gain YTD22.43831.48471%
P/E Ratio62.6611.51545%
Revenue385M23.2M1,659%
Total Cash116M4.74M2,448%
Total Debt105M1.09M9,615%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KHTRF vs MCUJF: Fundamental Ratings
KHTRF
MCUJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10098
SMR RATING
1..100
9294
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9724
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8533

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCUJF's Valuation (63) in the null industry is in the same range as KHTRF (72). This means that MCUJF’s stock grew similarly to KHTRF’s over the last 12 months.

MCUJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as KHTRF (100). This means that MCUJF’s stock grew similarly to KHTRF’s over the last 12 months.

KHTRF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as MCUJF (94). This means that KHTRF’s stock grew similarly to MCUJF’s over the last 12 months.

MCUJF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as KHTRF (59). This means that MCUJF’s stock grew similarly to KHTRF’s over the last 12 months.

MCUJF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KHTRF (97). This means that MCUJF’s stock grew significantly faster than KHTRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KHTRFMCUJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KHTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCUJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PJT182.861.70
+0.94%
PJT Partners
BKR50.520.42
+0.84%
Baker Hughes Company
QTTB1.890.01
+0.53%
Q32 Bio
BBDC8.95-0.06
-0.67%
Barings BDC
INR13.76-0.21
-1.50%
Infinity Natural Resources Inc

KHTRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KHTRF and PLSH have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KHTRF and PLSH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KHTRF
1D Price
Change %
KHTRF100%
N/A
PLSH - KHTRF
25%
Poorly correlated
-13.64%
OVATF - KHTRF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BHC - KHTRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
ORGO - KHTRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-12.39%
ESALF - KHTRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.37%
More

MCUJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCUJF and LVRLF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCUJF and LVRLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCUJF
1D Price
Change %
MCUJF100%
N/A
LVRLF - MCUJF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MVMDF - MCUJF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEDXF - MCUJF
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.57%
KHTRF - MCUJF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INDV - MCUJF
3%
Poorly correlated
+4.87%
More