It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KIKOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYNNHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KIKOF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YNNHF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
KIKOF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while YNNHF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.95%.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
KIKOF | YNNHF | KIKOF / YNNHF | |
Capitalization | 11.1B | 2.37B | 469% |
EBITDA | 90B | 1.05B | 8,547% |
Gain YTD | 3.109 | 37.097 | 8% |
P/E Ratio | 34.36 | 21.14 | 163% |
Revenue | 598B | 6B | 9,967% |
Total Cash | 86B | 1.61B | 5,358% |
Total Debt | 50.8B | 129M | 39,380% |
KIKOF | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KIKOF | YNNHF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago14% | 2 days ago50% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago6% | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago13% | 2 days ago25% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago13% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago16% | 2 days ago22% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago17% | 2 days ago19% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago13% | 2 days ago60% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
MSSIX | 15.59 | N/A | N/A |
Victory Trivalent International Sm-Cp R6 | |||
MTODX | 20.94 | -0.10 | -0.48% |
NYLI Income Builder Class R6 | |||
FCFMX | 19.79 | -0.10 | -0.50% |
Fidelity Series Total Market Index | |||
DIEYX | 38.93 | -0.23 | -0.59% |
BNY Mellon International Core Equity Y | |||
GXXCX | 8.80 | -0.06 | -0.68% |
abrdn US Sustainable Leaders C |
A.I.dvisor tells us that KIKOF and YNNHF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KIKOF and YNNHF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KIKOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KIKOF | 100% | N/A | ||
YNNHF - KIKOF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SGLJF - KIKOF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
LSF - KIKOF | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.29% | ||
JBSAY - KIKOF | 0% Poorly correlated | +3.04% | ||
IRCKF - KIKOF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that YNNHF and KIKOF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YNNHF and KIKOF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YNNHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
YNNHF | 100% | N/A | ||
KIKOF - YNNHF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
TUFBY - YNNHF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
TYCMY - YNNHF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
CHFLF - YNNHF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
RGF - YNNHF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.70% | ||
More |