KIM
Price
$24.70
Change
+$0.32 (+1.31%)
Updated
Jun 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.65B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
REG
Price
$77.35
Change
+$0.47 (+0.61%)
Updated
Jun 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.16B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KIM vs REG

KIM vs REG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Kimco Realty (KIM) vs. Regency Centers (REG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Kimco Realty (KIM) has outperformed Regency Centers (REG) year-to-date, with a 19.13% return compared to REG's 16.95%.
  • Both stocks offer solid dividend yields, KIM at 4.36% and REG at 3.78%, appealing to income investors in the retail REIT (Real Estate Investment Trust) sector.
  • Market caps are closely matched, with KIM at $16.1 billion and REG at $14.9 billion, reflecting similar scale in grocery-anchored shopping centers.
  • P/E ratios are comparable around 28-29, suggesting balanced valuations amid stable recent performance.
  • Upcoming Q1 2026 earnings for both could influence near-term momentum, with analysts anticipating steady funds from operations (FFO—a key REIT profitability metric).
  • KIM exhibits slightly higher volatility (beta 1.05) versus REG's 0.92, highlighting a trade-off in risk profiles.

Introduction

Kimco Realty (KIM) and Regency Centers (REG) are prominent retail REITs specializing in grocery-anchored shopping centers, making them natural comparables for investors navigating the evolving retail real estate landscape. This analysis contrasts their recent market positioning, performance metrics, and sector dynamics, aiding dividend seekers, value-oriented traders, and those eyeing resilience in consumer staples-driven properties. With interest rate sensitivity and leasing momentum key factors, understanding their relative strengths helps inform portfolio decisions in a competitive REIT environment.

KIM Overview and Recent Performance

Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) owns and operates a vast portfolio of open-air, grocery-anchored shopping centers across the U.S., emphasizing necessity-based retail. In recent market activity, KIM shares have advanced approximately 19% year-to-date and 23% over the past year, trading near $23.88 with a 52-week range of $19.59 to $24.31. This momentum stems from resilient leasing demand, a 4.36% dividend yield bolstered by consistent payout growth, and positive analyst updates, including raised price targets. Sentiment has been supported by strong occupancy and redevelopment initiatives, though shares remain sensitive to broader REIT sector pressures like interest rates. Upcoming Q1 earnings are expected to highlight modest revenue gains in a stable retail backdrop.

REG Overview and Recent Performance

Regency Centers Corporation (REG) focuses on high-quality, grocery-anchored neighborhood and community shopping centers in affluent suburban markets. Over recent weeks, REG stock has gained about 17% year-to-date and 16.6% annually, hovering around $79.95 within a 52-week band of $66.86 to $81.66. Performance reflects solid same-property net operating income growth and a 3.78% dividend yield, with a same-property portfolio at 94.1% leased as of year-end 2025. Investor interest has built ahead of Q1 earnings, driven by value perceptions in retail REITs and consistent profitability, though gains have trailed peers amid sector rotation.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page highlights the platform's most suitable AI trading bots for today's market conditions, curating just 25 top performers from a total of 351 bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots vary in styles—from short-term scalping to long-term trend following—with performance metrics tailored to volatility, momentum, and sector rotations. Available statistics showcase win rates often exceeding 60%, average returns in the double digits annually for top models, and trade volumes in the hundreds per bot, enabling automated execution on stocks like REITs. This curated selection empowers traders to leverage AI-driven insights without manual analysis. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to identify bots aligning with your risk tolerance and timeframe.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Both KIM and REG thrive on grocery-anchored retail models resilient to e-commerce shifts, but KIM's larger scale offers broader diversification across 400+ properties versus REG's focus on premium, affluent locales. Growth drivers include redevelopment pipelines for KIM and steady occupancy for REG, with recent momentum favoring KIM's higher returns amid positive leasing trends. Risk factors diverge: REG's lower beta signals greater stability, while KIM's higher yield compensates for modest leverage (debt-to-equity around 79%). Sector exposure is nearly identical in retail REITs, but market sentiment tilts toward KIM for income appeal, though REG trades at a slight valuation premium on quality metrics like net margins (33.95% vs. 27.32%).

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models would currently lean toward KIM over REG, citing superior trend consistency with 19% YTD gains, a higher dividend yield, and stronger relative momentum in recent market activity. REG offers stability and quality positioning, but KIM's catalysts like payout growth and earnings anticipation provide a probabilistic edge for trend-following strategies, assuming sustained retail resilience.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
KIM vs. REG commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KIM is a Hold and REG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (KIM: $24.38 vs. REG: $76.88)
Brand notoriety: KIM and REG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KIM: 176% vs. REG: 111%
Market capitalization -- KIM: $16.65B vs. REG: $14.16B
KIM [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $16.65B. REG’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $14.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $9.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KIM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileREG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KIM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • REG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KIM is a better buy in the long-term than REG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KIM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while REG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KIM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • REG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, REG is a better buy in the short-term than KIM.

Price Growth

KIM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -5.32% price change this week, while REG (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -3.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

KIM is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

REG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.89% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KIM($16.7B) has a higher market cap than REG($14.2B). KIM has higher P/E ratio than REG: KIM (28.38) vs REG (26.58). KIM YTD gains are higher at: 22.953 vs. REG (13.520). KIM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.48B vs. REG (1.19B). REG has less debt than KIM: REG (5.6B) vs KIM (8.31B). KIM has higher revenues than REG: KIM (2.16B) vs REG (1.59B).
KIMREGKIM / REG
Capitalization16.7B14.2B118%
EBITDA1.48B1.19B124%
Gain YTD22.95313.520170%
P/E Ratio28.3826.58107%
Revenue2.16B1.59B136%
Total Cash168MN/A-
Total Debt8.31B5.6B148%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KIM vs REG: Fundamental Ratings
KIM
REG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6238
SMR RATING
1..100
8579
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2635
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5172
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KIM's Valuation (38) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as REG (60). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to REG’s over the last 12 months.

REG's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (62). This means that REG’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

REG's SMR Rating (79) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (85). This means that REG’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's Price Growth Rating (26) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as REG (35). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to REG’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as REG (72). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to REG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KIMREG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KIM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
REG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BARK10.030.62
+6.59%
BARK
CLPT17.770.96
+5.71%
ClearPoint Neuro
CXT46.931.58
+3.48%
Crane NXT Co
YUMC42.93-0.35
-0.81%
Yum China Holdings
YMT0.45-0.03
-6.08%
Yimutian Inc.

KIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KIM has been closely correlated with BRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KIM jumps, then BRX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KIM
1D Price
Change %
KIM100%
-0.45%
BRX - KIM
84%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
KRG - KIM
82%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
FRT - KIM
78%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
REG - KIM
76%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
UE - KIM
76%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
More

REG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, REG has been closely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if REG jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To REG
1D Price
Change %
REG100%
-0.63%
FRT - REG
78%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
KIM - REG
76%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
UDR - REG
76%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
EQR - REG
75%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
AVB - REG
74%
Closely correlated
-1.29%
More