KIM vs ZION
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KIM is a Hold and ZION is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KIM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZION’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- KIM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ZION’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KIM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZION’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KIM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- ZION’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
KIM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -0.78% price change this week, while ZION (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.67%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.16%.
Reported Earning Dates
KIM is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
ZION is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.90% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
@Regional Banks (+2.47% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| KIM | ZION | KIM / ZION | |
| Capitalization | 13.2B | 6.41B | 206% |
| EBITDA | 1.4B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.777 | -15.938 | 74% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.72 | 9.88 | 189% |
| Revenue | 1.78B | 3.12B | 57% |
| Total Cash | 1.11B | 700M | 159% |
| Total Debt | 7.73B | 2.07B | 374% |
KIM | ZION | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 61 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 7 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 21 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZION's Valuation (62) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as KIM (73) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that ZION’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.
KIM's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ZION (61) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to ZION’s over the last 12 months.
ZION's SMR Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for KIM (85) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that ZION’s stock grew significantly faster than KIM’s over the last 12 months.
KIM's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ZION (62) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to ZION’s over the last 12 months.
KIM's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZION (67) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KIM’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZION’s over the last 12 months.
| KIM | ZION | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 65% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SPXL | 123.01 | 7.17 | +6.19% |
| Direxion Daily S&P500® Bull 3X ETF | |||
| TBLD | 17.78 | 0.26 | +1.48% |
| Thornburg Income Builder Opportunities Trust | |||
| JULT | 37.65 | 0.46 | +1.24% |
| AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF | |||
| CNYA | 27.29 | 0.09 | +0.33% |
| iShares MSCI China A ETF | |||
| HLGE | 28.52 | N/A | N/A |
| Hartford Longevity Economy ETF | |||
ZION and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZION has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZION jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZION | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZION | 100% | +2.10% | ||
| FNB - ZION | 91% Closely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| SNV - ZION | 91% Closely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| CFG - ZION | 90% Closely correlated | +2.60% | ||
| WTFC - ZION | 90% Closely correlated | +3.44% | ||
| PNFP - ZION | 89% Closely correlated | +2.52% | ||
More | ||||