Ad is loading...
KINAX vs LSHAX
KINAX vs LSHAX Comparison
Open Charts KINAX vs LSHAX
Kinetics Internet Adv A
Price$87.76
Change+$6.04 (+7.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.85M
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corp Rest Adv A
Price$35.01
Change+$3.65 (+11.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40M
KINAX vs LSHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KINAX vs. LSHAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KINAX is a Buy and LSHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KINAX has more cash in the bank: 287M vs. LSHAX (40M). LSHAX pays higher dividends than KINAX: LSHAX (0.79) vs KINAX (0.23). KINAX was incepted earlier than LSHAX: KINAX (24 years) vs LSHAX (18 years). LSHAX (2.21) is less costly to investors than KINAX (2.00). KINAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. LSHAX (1.00). KINAX (6%) and LSHAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. KINAX (2500) and LSHAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LSHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.07 vs. KINAX (16.25). LSHAX return over 5 years is better than : 262.71 vs. KINAX (194.71).
| KINAX | LSHAX | KINAX / LSHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.63 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 2.21 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.539 | -2.305 | 501% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 40M | 718% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.79 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.25 | 57.07 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.08 | 63.52 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 194.71 | 262.71 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.68 | 206.27 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...