This stock comparison evaluates KKR & Co. Inc. and SEI Investments Company in today's dynamic market, where alternative investments clash with traditional asset servicing. Traders seeking momentum plays may eye KKR's growth trajectory, while value-oriented investors might prefer SEIC's stability. Recent market activity highlights contrasts in performance, valuation, and catalysts, aiding decisions on relative positioning. With volatility in equities and shifts in investor sentiment toward diversified strategies, understanding these differences supports informed trading and portfolio allocation.
KKR & Co. Inc. is a leading global investment firm specializing in private equity, real estate, infrastructure, and credit strategies. It manages diverse assets through acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, and growth equity, holding investments typically for five to seven years before exits via IPOs or sales. With a market cap of $96 billion and trading around $104 recently, the stock's P/E ratio stands at 44.41, signaling growth expectations.
In recent weeks, KKR has shown resilience amid private credit redemptions and market challenges, bolstered by strategic moves like investments in Samsung SDS and plans to privatize Taiyo Holdings. Year-to-date gains of 18.33% and one-month advances near 14% reflect positive sentiment from expanding assets under management (AUM, total value of assets managed) and deal flow, despite broader sector volatility.
SEI Investments Company provides technology-driven solutions for wealth management, retirement services, and investment operations, serving financial advisors, institutions, and corporations globally. As an asset management holding company, it offers processing outsourcing, advisory services, and mutual funds, emphasizing scalable platforms for client portfolios. Trading near $81 with a $9.95 billion market cap, its P/E ratio of 14.46 indicates relative value.
Recent market activity for SEIC has been mixed, with year-to-date returns at 0.74% and one-month gains of about 2.57%. Key influences include new client wins, a partnership with IBM for agentic AI to enhance enterprise transformation, and expansions in alternatives like litigation finance. Upcoming earnings are anticipated to show growth, supporting steady sentiment in a stable sector.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top-performing AI trading bots curated from hundreds available—specifically, the best 25 out of 351 bots analyzed for current market conditions. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, scalping, and multi-agent systems across timeframes from 5 minutes to days, targeting sectors such as semiconductors, energy, industrials, and precious metals. Performance stats impress with annualized returns ranging from +30% to over +120%, win rates of 55-87%, profit factors up to 6.94, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 10 in top cases, based on thousands of trades with built-in risk management. Whether virtual for signals or brokerage-integrated, they adapt to volatility. Explore these bots to enhance your trading edge tailored to stocks like KKR and SEIC.
KKR and SEIC diverge in business models: KKR's alternative asset focus drives high-growth via M&A (mergers and acquisitions) and AUM expansion, contrasting SEIC's recurring revenue from fintech platforms and outsourcing.
Growth drivers highlight trade-offs—KKR benefits from dealmaking amid rising private capital demand, while SEIC leverages client retention and AI integrations for steady expansion. Recent momentum favors KKR with superior YTD and short-term gains, but SEIC offers lower volatility (beta around 0.94 vs. KKR's 1.93).
Risk factors include KKR's exposure to credit liquidity and economic cycles versus SEIC's dependence on fee-based stability. Sector-wise, KKR taps private markets, SEIC public wealth tech. Market sentiment tilts toward KKR's upside potential despite premiums.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward KKR with higher probability of outperformance, driven by consistent recent momentum, YTD gains, and catalysts like acquisitions amid alternative asset tailwinds. SEIC presents stability and value, but lags in trend strength. This assessment reflects observable data patterns, not guarantees.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KKR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSEIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KKR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEIC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
KKR (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.65% price change this week, while SEIC (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.34%.
KKR is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
SEIC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| KKR | SEIC | KKR / SEIC | |
| Capitalization | 83.9B | 10.8B | 777% |
| EBITDA | 9.89B | 1.04B | 955% |
| Gain YTD | -26.456 | 9.022 | -293% |
| P/E Ratio | 31.77 | 15.26 | 208% |
| Revenue | 20.4B | 2.37B | 861% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 395M | - |
| Total Debt | 54.5B | 69.5M | 78,417% |
KKR | SEIC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 70 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KKR's Valuation (77) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SEIC (88). This means that KKR’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.
SEIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KKR (70). This means that SEIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.
SEIC's SMR Rating (32) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KKR (70). This means that SEIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.
SEIC's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (62). This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
SEIC's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (87). This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
| KKR | SEIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 28% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 52% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEIC | 100% | +0.95% | ||
| RJF - SEIC | 71% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| AMP - SEIC | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| TROW - SEIC | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| STT - SEIC | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| KKR - SEIC | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.16% | ||
More | ||||