Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCAX vs RGABX
KLCAX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts KLCAX vs RGABX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap A
Price$18.88
Change-$0.10 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$78.03
Change-$0.37 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
KLCAX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCAX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCAX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. KLCAX (1.3B). KLCAX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCAX was incepted earlier than RGABX: KLCAX (18 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than KLCAX (1.19). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCAX (18.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: RGABX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.87 vs. KLCAX (-11.14). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 39.89 vs. KLCAX (-40.43).
| KLCAX | RGABX | KLCAX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.39 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.39 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.520 | 17.480 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.14 | 14.87 | -75% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.38 | 56.56 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.43 | 39.89 | -101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.96 | 87.35 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement