Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCAX vs RGABX
KLCAX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts KLCAX vs RGABX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap A
Price$19.61
Change+$0.27 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$79.16
Change+$0.59 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
KLCAX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCAX vs. RGABX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCAX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. KLCAX (1.3B). KLCAX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCAX was incepted earlier than RGABX: KLCAX (18 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than KLCAX (1.19). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCAX (18.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: RGABX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.92 vs. KLCAX (-12.01). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 34.19 vs. KLCAX (-43.07).
| KLCAX | RGABX | KLCAX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.39 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.39 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.712 | 19.181 | 92% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.01 | 12.92 | -93% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.51 | 69.62 | -22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.07 | 34.19 | -126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.94 | 88.66 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement