Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCCX vs RGABX
KLCCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts KLCCX vs RGABX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$11.59
Change-$0.03 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$75.28
Change-$0.32 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.96B
KLCCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCCX vs. RGABX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCCX is a StrongBuy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. KLCCX (1.25B). KLCCX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: KLCCX (18 years) vs RGABX (23 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: RGABX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.92 vs. KLCCX (-26.64). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 28.71 vs. KLCCX (-61.12).
| KLCCX | RGABX | KLCCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.39 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.39 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.667 | 13.339 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -26.64 | 10.92 | -244% |
| Returns for 3 years | -46.20 | 45.81 | -101% |
| Returns for 5 years | -61.12 | 28.71 | -213% |
| Returns for 10 years | -34.87 | 79.20 | -44% |