Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCCX vs RGABX
KLCCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts KLCCX vs RGABX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$12.01
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$77.80
Change-$0.13 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
KLCCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCCX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCCX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. KLCCX (1.29B). KLCCX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: KLCCX (18 years) vs RGABX (23 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: RGABX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.98 vs. KLCCX (-24.08). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 40.59 vs. KLCCX (-57.55).
| KLCCX | RGABX | KLCCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.39 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.39 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.381 | 17.133 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -24.08 | 15.98 | -151% |
| Returns for 3 years | -43.27 | 54.27 | -80% |
| Returns for 5 years | -57.55 | 40.59 | -142% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.98 | 85.86 | -38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement