Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCCX vs RGAFX
KLCCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts KLCCX vs RGAFX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$12.01
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$87.81
Change-$0.15 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
KLCCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCCX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. KLCCX (1.29B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than KLCCX: RGAFX (0.55) vs KLCCX (0.00). KLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: KLCCX (18 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: RGAFX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.27 vs. KLCCX (-24.08). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.83 vs. KLCCX (-57.55).
| KLCCX | RGAFX | KLCCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.34 | 556% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.34 | 576% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.381 | 17.992 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.55 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -24.08 | 18.27 | -132% |
| Returns for 3 years | -43.27 | 61.26 | -71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -57.55 | 50.83 | -113% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.98 | 104.93 | -31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement