Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCCX vs RGAFX
KLCCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts KLCCX vs RGAFX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$12.27
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$88.83
Change+$0.04 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
KLCCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCCX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. KLCCX (1.3B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than KLCCX: RGAFX (0.53) vs KLCCX (0.00). KLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: KLCCX (18 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: RGAFX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.13 vs. KLCCX (-23.46). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.15 vs. KLCCX (-57.86).
| KLCCX | RGAFX | KLCCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.34 | 556% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.34 | 576% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.857 | 19.363 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.46 | 16.13 | -145% |
| Returns for 3 years | -39.56 | 69.07 | -57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -57.86 | 49.15 | -118% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.58 | 110.40 | -26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement