Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCCX vs RGAGX
KLCCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts KLCCX vs RGAGX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$12.15
Change-$0.17 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.11
Change-$0.60 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
KLCCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCCX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. KLCCX (1.26B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than KLCCX: RGAGX (0.56) vs KLCCX (0.00). KLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: KLCCX (18 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: RGAGX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.56 vs. KLCCX (-27.51). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 34.75 vs. KLCCX (-60.26).
| KLCCX | RGAGX | KLCCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.30 | 630% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.30 | 653% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.714 | 15.506 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 330B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -27.51 | 7.56 | -364% |
| Returns for 3 years | -42.03 | 63.18 | -67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -60.26 | 34.75 | -173% |
| Returns for 10 years | -31.59 | 91.31 | -35% |