Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCCX vs RGAGX
KLCCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts KLCCX vs RGAGX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$12.27
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$89.01
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
KLCCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCCX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. KLCCX (1.3B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than KLCCX: RGAGX (0.58) vs KLCCX (0.00). KLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: KLCCX (18 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: RGAGX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.19 vs. KLCCX (-23.46). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 49.41 vs. KLCCX (-57.86).
| KLCCX | RGAGX | KLCCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.30 | 630% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.30 | 653% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.857 | 19.396 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.58 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.46 | 16.19 | -145% |
| Returns for 3 years | -39.56 | 69.25 | -57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -57.86 | 49.41 | -117% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.58 | 110.76 | -26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement