Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCIX vs RGABX
KLCIX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts KLCIX vs RGABX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap IS
Price$21.21
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$77.80
Change-$0.13 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
KLCIX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCIX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCIX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. KLCIX (1.29B). KLCIX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCIX was incepted earlier than RGABX: KLCIX (18 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than KLCIX (0.94). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCIX (18.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCIX: RGABX (250) vs KLCIX (1000000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.98 vs. KLCIX (-8.21). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 40.59 vs. KLCIX (-35.11).
| KLCIX | RGABX | KLCIX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.39 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.39 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.435 | 17.133 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.21 | 15.98 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.77 | 54.27 | -33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.11 | 40.59 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.05 | 85.86 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement