Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCSX vs RGABX
KLCSX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts KLCSX vs RGABX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$21.88
Change-$0.29 (-1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$75.99
Change-$0.53 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
KLCSX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCSX vs. RGABX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCSX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. KLCSX (1.26B). KLCSX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCSX was incepted earlier than RGABX: KLCSX (12 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than KLCSX (0.87). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: KLCSX (0) vs RGABX (250). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.42 vs. KLCSX (-12.02). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 25.42 vs. KLCSX (-38.54).
| KLCSX | RGABX | KLCSX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.39 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.39 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.943 | 14.408 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 330B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.02 | 5.42 | -222% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.16 | 55.94 | -27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.54 | 25.42 | -152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.02 | 73.22 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement