Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCSX vs RGAGX
KLCSX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts KLCSX vs RGAGX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$21.25
Change+$0.22 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.35
Change+$0.53 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
KLCSX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCSX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCSX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. KLCSX (1.25B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than KLCSX: RGAGX (0.60) vs KLCSX (0.00). KLCSX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: KLCSX (12 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). KLCSX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: KLCSX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.26 vs. KLCSX (-9.24). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 39.74 vs. KLCSX (-39.97).
| KLCSX | RGAGX | KLCSX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.30 | 260% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.30 | 290% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.400 | 15.828 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.24 | 16.26 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.16 | 55.92 | -36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.97 | 39.74 | -101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.57 | 102.72 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement