Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCSX vs RGAHX
KLCSX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KLCSX vs RGAHX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$22.06
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$87.60
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
KLCSX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCSX vs. RGAHX commentary
Oct 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCSX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. KLCSX (1.3B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KLCSX: RGAHX (0.45) vs KLCSX (0.00). KLCSX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KLCSX (12 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). KLCSX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: KLCSX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.90 vs. KLCSX (-7.12). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 48.14 vs. KLCSX (-34.85).
| KLCSX | RGAHX | KLCSX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.44 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.44 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.905 | 19.281 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.12 | 15.90 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.58 | 68.37 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.85 | 48.14 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.05 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement