Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCSX vs RGAHX
KLCSX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KLCSX vs RGAHX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$22.56
Change+$0.25 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$88.42
Change+$0.60 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.99B
KLCSX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCSX vs. RGAHX commentary
Oct 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCSX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. KLCSX (1.31B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KLCSX: RGAHX (0.45) vs KLCSX (0.00). KLCSX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KLCSX (12 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). KLCSX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: KLCSX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.47 vs. KLCSX (-7.39). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.34 vs. KLCSX (-34.99).
| KLCSX | RGAHX | KLCSX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.44 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.44 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.577 | 20.398 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 343B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.39 | 14.47 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.76 | 69.91 | -15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.99 | 44.34 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement