Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLGAX vs RGACX
KLGAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KLGAX vs RGACX
KLGAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLGAX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLGAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. KLGAX (968M). KLGAX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLGAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KLGAX (20 years) vs RGACX (24 years). KLGAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). KLGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLGAX: RGACX (250) vs KLGAX (15000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.02 vs. KLGAX (-2.36). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 9.61 vs. KLGAX (-3.35).
| KLGAX | RGACX | KLGAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.93 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.93 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.112 | 8.108 | -14% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 250 | 6,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 968M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.36 | -1.02 | 232% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.59 | 40.74 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.35 | 9.61 | -35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.59 | 98.20 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement