Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLGAX vs RGAHX
KLGAX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KLGAX vs RGAHX
KLGAX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLGAX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLGAX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. KLGAX (1.02B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KLGAX: RGAHX (0.39) vs KLGAX (0.00). KLGAX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KLGAX (20 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). KLGAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). KLGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLGAX: RGAHX (250) vs KLGAX (15000). KLGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.34 vs. RGAHX (8.63). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 18.83 vs. KLGAX (8.27).
| KLGAX | RGAHX | KLGAX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.44 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.44 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.893 | 6.676 | 13% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 250 | 6,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.34 | 8.63 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.13 | 45.32 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.27 | 18.83 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.46 | 109.21 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers