KLGDF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.95M
RNDXF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.02 (+100.00%)
Updated
May 6 closing price
Capitalization
3.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KLGDF vs RNDXF

Header iconKLGDF vs RNDXF Comparison
Open Charts KLGDF vs RNDXFBanner chart's image
Kalo Gold
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$113K
Capitalization4.95M
Randgold & Exploration
Price$0.04
Change+$0.02 (+100.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization3.69M
KLGDF vs RNDXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KLGDF vs. RNDXF commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLGDF is a Hold and RNDXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (KLGDF: $0.04 vs. RNDXF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: KLGDF and RNDXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KLGDF: 291% vs. RNDXF: 0%
Market capitalization -- KLGDF: $4.95M vs. RNDXF: $3.69M
KLGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.95M. RNDXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KLGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRNDXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KLGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RNDXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RNDXF is a better buy in the long-term than KLGDF.

Price Growth

KLGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +15.06% price change this week, while RNDXF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +8.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +47.31%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+8.15% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KLGDF($4.95M) has a higher market cap than RNDXF($3.69M). RNDXF YTD gains are higher at: 108.500 vs. KLGDF (62.000). KLGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.66M vs. RNDXF (-21.31M). RNDXF has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. KLGDF (1.53M). KLGDF (0) and RNDXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
KLGDFRNDXFKLGDF / RNDXF
Capitalization4.95M3.69M134%
EBITDA-2.66M-21.31M12%
Gain YTD62.000108.50057%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.53M106M1%
Total Debt20.4KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RNDXF: Fundamental Ratings
RNDXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEMIX28.44N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual International Value A
APGRX19.86N/A
N/A
Yorktown Growth Institutional
MSGRX12.64N/A
N/A
Meridian Small Cap Growth Institutional
MFECX127.24N/A
N/A
MFS Growth C
ALVAX22.21-0.04
-0.18%
American Beacon Large Cap Value A

KLGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KLGDF and MNSAF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KLGDF and MNSAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KLGDF
1D Price
Change %
KLGDF100%
+13.45%
MNSAF - KLGDF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RNDXF - KLGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPTA - KLGDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
MSLVF - KLGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+18.23%
FFMGF - KLGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+9.82%
More

RNDXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RNDXF and XTGRF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RNDXF and XTGRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RNDXF
1D Price
Change %
RNDXF100%
N/A
XTGRF - RNDXF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMEGF - RNDXF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
ETFLF - RNDXF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KLGDF - RNDXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+13.45%
VMSSF - RNDXF
20%
Poorly correlated
+49.17%
More