KLIB
Price
$135.00
Change
-$5.00 (-3.57%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
68.01M
KMERF
Price
$35.55
Change
+$1.70 (+5.02%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
Capitalization
9.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

KLIB vs KMERF

Header iconKLIB vs KMERF Comparison
Open Charts KLIB vs KMERFBanner chart's image
Killbuck Bancshares
Price$135.00
Change-$5.00 (-3.57%)
Volume$100
Capitalization68.01M
Komercni Banka A.S
Price$35.55
Change+$1.70 (+5.02%)
Volume$100
Capitalization9.34B
KLIB vs KMERF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KLIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KLIB vs. KMERF commentary
Aug 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLIB is a Hold and KMERF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2025
Stock price -- (KLIB: $130.00 vs. KMERF: $35.55)
Brand notoriety: KLIB and KMERF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KLIB: 21% vs. KMERF: 100%
Market capitalization -- KLIB: $68.01M vs. KMERF: $9.34B
KLIB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $68.01M. KMERF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $9.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KLIB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKMERF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KLIB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KMERF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KMERF is a better buy in the long-term than KLIB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KLIB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • KLIB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

KLIB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.70% price change this week, while KMERF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.10% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KMERF($9.34B) has a higher market cap than KLIB($68M). KMERF has higher P/E ratio than KLIB: KMERF (10.27) vs KLIB (7.15). KLIB YTD gains are higher at: 23.106 vs. KMERF (0.000). KLIB has less debt than KMERF: KLIB (1.92M) vs KMERF (76.9B). KMERF has higher revenues than KLIB: KMERF (39.8B) vs KLIB (29.6M).
KLIBKMERFKLIB / KMERF
Capitalization68M9.34B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.1060.000-
P/E Ratio7.1510.2770%
Revenue29.6M39.8B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.92M76.9B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KLIB vs KMERF: Fundamental Ratings
KLIB
KMERF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9044
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10067
SMR RATING
1..100
473
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5271
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7743
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMERF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as KLIB (14). This means that KMERF’s stock grew similarly to KLIB’s over the last 12 months.

KMERF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KLIB (100). This means that KMERF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KLIB’s over the last 12 months.

KMERF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KLIB (47). This means that KMERF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KLIB’s over the last 12 months.

KLIB's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as KMERF (71). This means that KLIB’s stock grew similarly to KMERF’s over the last 12 months.

KMERF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KLIB (77). This means that KMERF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KLIB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KLIBKMERF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
36%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KLIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMUN49.60N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF
BSSX24.94-0.03
-0.14%
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Muncpl Bd ETF
BFZ10.33-0.02
-0.19%
BLACKROCK CA Municipal
NULG97.55-0.23
-0.24%
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
ARMG10.73-0.03
-0.27%
Leverage Shares 2X Long Arm Daily ETF

KLIB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLIB has been loosely correlated with BBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KLIB jumps, then BBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KLIB
1D Price
Change %
KLIB100%
-3.70%
BBD - KLIB
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
FRAF - KLIB
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
KMERF - KLIB
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NBNKF - KLIB
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PWBK - KLIB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KMERF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KMERF and BMDPF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMERF and BMDPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMERF
1D Price
Change %
KMERF100%
N/A
BMDPF - KMERF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.83%
KLIB - KMERF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.70%
BNCDY - KMERF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTFF - KMERF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KISB - KMERF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
More