KLKBY
Price
$4.29
Change
-$0.87 (-16.89%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
5.23B
RSSFF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.68M
Ad is loading...

KLKBY vs RSSFF

Header iconKLKBY vs RSSFF Comparison
Open Charts KLKBY vs RSSFFBanner chart's image
Kuala Lumpur Kepong Berhad
Price$4.29
Change-$0.87 (-16.89%)
Volume$151
Capitalization5.23B
Affinor Growers
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.48K
Capitalization1.68M
KLKBY vs RSSFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
RSSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KLKBY vs. RSSFF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLKBY is a Hold and RSSFF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (KLKBY: $4.20 vs. RSSFF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: KLKBY and RSSFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KLKBY: 100% vs. RSSFF: 12%
Market capitalization -- KLKBY: $5.23B vs. RSSFF: $1.68M
KLKBY [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] is valued at $5.23B. RSSFF’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $1.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KLKBY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRSSFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KLKBY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RSSFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both KLKBY and RSSFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RSSFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RSSFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

KLKBY (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RSSFF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was -11.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +2.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+2.56% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KLKBY($5.23B) has a higher market cap than RSSFF($1.68M). RSSFF YTD gains are higher at: 39.000 vs. KLKBY (0.000). KLKBY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.09B vs. RSSFF (-316.9K). KLKBY has more cash in the bank: 2.47B vs. RSSFF (949K). RSSFF has less debt than KLKBY: RSSFF (478K) vs KLKBY (10.4B). KLKBY has higher revenues than RSSFF: KLKBY (22.6B) vs RSSFF (0).
KLKBYRSSFFKLKBY / RSSFF
Capitalization5.23B1.68M310,946%
EBITDA2.09B-316.9K-658,569%
Gain YTD0.00039.000-
P/E Ratio42.57N/A-
Revenue22.6B0-
Total Cash2.47B949K259,747%
Total Debt10.4B478K2,175,732%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KLKBY vs RSSFF: Fundamental Ratings
KLKBY
RSSFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
98100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7137
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
72100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KLKBY's Valuation (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RSSFF (95). This means that KLKBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RSSFF’s over the last 12 months.

KLKBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RSSFF (100). This means that KLKBY’s stock grew similarly to RSSFF’s over the last 12 months.

KLKBY's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as RSSFF (100). This means that KLKBY’s stock grew similarly to RSSFF’s over the last 12 months.

RSSFF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KLKBY (71). This means that RSSFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KLKBY’s over the last 12 months.

KLKBY's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as RSSFF (100). This means that KLKBY’s stock grew similarly to RSSFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KLKBYRSSFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RSSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGORX65.610.87
+1.34%
Putnam Large Cap Growth R
SSVSX31.870.22
+0.70%
Victory Special Value A
CEKRX13.420.09
+0.68%
Columbia Emerging Markets Inst2
JORSX17.780.03
+0.17%
JHancock Small Cap Core R6
DAMDX27.27-0.01
-0.04%
Dunham Monthly Distribution A

KLKBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KLKBY and RSSFF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KLKBY and RSSFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KLKBY
1D Price
Change %
KLKBY100%
N/A
RSSFF - KLKBY
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
SALRY - KLKBY
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.54%
MNHVF - KLKBY
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
SALRF - KLKBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SARDY - KLKBY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RSSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RSSFF has been loosely correlated with EDESY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RSSFF jumps, then EDESY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSSFF
1D Price
Change %
RSSFF100%
-1.59%
EDESY - RSSFF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KUBR - RSSFF
25%
Poorly correlated
+19.11%
MHGVY - RSSFF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
KLKBY - RSSFF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SALRY - RSSFF
9%
Poorly correlated
-3.54%
More