KLKLF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
16.28M
LVGLF
Price
$0.17
Change
+$0.02 (+13.33%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
25.33M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KLKLF vs LVGLF

Header iconKLKLF vs LVGLF Comparison
Open Charts KLKLF vs LVGLFBanner chart's image
KIRKLAND LAKE DISCOVERIES
Price$0.14
Change-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Volume$141.8K
Capitalization16.28M
LAKE VICTORIA GOLD
Price$0.17
Change+$0.02 (+13.33%)
Volume$209.99K
Capitalization25.33M
KLKLF vs LVGLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KLKLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KLKLF vs. LVGLF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLKLF is a Hold and LVGLF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (KLKLF: $0.14 vs. LVGLF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: KLKLF and LVGLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KLKLF: 108% vs. LVGLF: 310%
Market capitalization -- KLKLF: $16.28M vs. LVGLF: $25.33M
KLKLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $16.28M. LVGLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $25.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KLKLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLVGLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KLKLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LVGLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both KLKLF and LVGLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KLKLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LVGLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KLKLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LVGLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LVGLF is a better buy in the short-term than KLKLF.

Price Growth

KLKLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +23.75% price change this week, while LVGLF (@Precious Metals) price change was +16.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3316.97%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.27% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LVGLF($25.3M) has a higher market cap than KLKLF($16.3M). KLKLF YTD gains are higher at: 312.121 vs. LVGLF (55.221). LVGLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.86M vs. KLKLF (-4.04M). KLKLF has more cash in the bank: 1.7M vs. LVGLF (114K). KLKLF (0) and LVGLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
KLKLFLVGLFKLKLF / LVGLF
Capitalization16.3M25.3M64%
EBITDA-4.04M-1.86M217%
Gain YTD312.12155.221565%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.7M114K1,492%
Total DebtN/A1.02M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KLKLF vs LVGLF: Fundamental Ratings
KLKLF
LVGLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
852
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3445
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KLKLF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as LVGLF (45). This means that KLKLF’s stock grew similarly to LVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

KLKLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LVGLF (100). This means that KLKLF’s stock grew similarly to LVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

KLKLF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LVGLF (100). This means that KLKLF’s stock grew similarly to LVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

KLKLF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as LVGLF (45). This means that KLKLF’s stock grew similarly to LVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

KLKLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LVGLF (100). This means that KLKLF’s stock grew similarly to LVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KLKLFLVGLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KLKLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ORCL240.324.51
+1.91%
Oracle Corp
EXLS43.59-0.48
-1.09%
ExlService Holdings
MLKN21.26-0.26
-1.21%
MillerKnoll
KUKE1.63-0.04
-2.40%
Kuke Music Holding Limited
SI14.81-0.96
-6.09%
Shoulder Innovations Inc

KLKLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KLKLF and STLRF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KLKLF and STLRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KLKLF
1D Price
Change %
KLKLF100%
-9.33%
STLRF - KLKLF
10%
Poorly correlated
+8.35%
HMRFF - KLKLF
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.54%
LVGLF - KLKLF
3%
Poorly correlated
+7.73%
RSGOF - KLKLF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMQFF - KLKLF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
More

LVGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LVGLF and PLGDF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LVGLF and PLGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVGLF
1D Price
Change %
LVGLF100%
+7.73%
PLGDF - LVGLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGLCF - LVGLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.30%
GRCAF - LVGLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
WGXRF - LVGLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.55%
FDMIF - LVGLF
12%
Poorly correlated
+5.61%
More