KLPEF
Price
$40.19
Change
-$0.81 (-1.98%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
11.58B
UNBLF
Price
$102.69
Change
-$0.35 (-0.34%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
14.89B
Interact to see
Advertisement

KLPEF vs UNBLF

Header iconKLPEF vs UNBLF Comparison
Open Charts KLPEF vs UNBLFBanner chart's image
Klepierre SA
Price$40.19
Change-$0.81 (-1.98%)
Volume$268
Capitalization11.58B
Unibail-Rodamco SE
Price$102.69
Change-$0.35 (-0.34%)
Volume$19
Capitalization14.89B
KLPEF vs UNBLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KLPEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KLPEF vs. UNBLF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLPEF is a Buy and UNBLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (KLPEF: $40.19 vs. UNBLF: $102.69)
Brand notoriety: KLPEF and UNBLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KLPEF: 10% vs. UNBLF: 20%
Market capitalization -- KLPEF: $11.58B vs. UNBLF: $14.89B
KLPEF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $11.58B. UNBLF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $14.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KLPEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUNBLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KLPEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UNBLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both KLPEF and UNBLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KLPEF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNBLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KLPEF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • UNBLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KLPEF is a better buy in the short-term than UNBLF.

Price Growth

KLPEF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -1.37% price change this week, while UNBLF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +0.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.31% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNBLF($14.9B) has a higher market cap than KLPEF($11.6B). UNBLF has higher P/E ratio than KLPEF: UNBLF (16.42) vs KLPEF (8.35). UNBLF (38.733) and KLPEF (38.586) have similar YTD gains . UNBLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.36B vs. KLPEF (1.84B). UNBLF has more cash in the bank: 3.31B vs. KLPEF (957M). KLPEF has less debt than UNBLF: KLPEF (8.42B) vs UNBLF (24.7B). UNBLF has higher revenues than KLPEF: UNBLF (3.21B) vs KLPEF (1.55B).
KLPEFUNBLFKLPEF / UNBLF
Capitalization11.6B14.9B78%
EBITDA1.84B2.36B78%
Gain YTD38.58638.733100%
P/E Ratio8.3516.4251%
Revenue1.55B3.21B48%
Total Cash957M3.31B29%
Total Debt8.42B24.7B34%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KLPEF vs UNBLF: Fundamental Ratings
KLPEF
UNBLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2552
SMR RATING
1..100
9196
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8299
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNBLF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as KLPEF (59). This means that UNBLF’s stock grew similarly to KLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

KLPEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as UNBLF (52). This means that KLPEF’s stock grew similarly to UNBLF’s over the last 12 months.

KLPEF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as UNBLF (96). This means that KLPEF’s stock grew similarly to UNBLF’s over the last 12 months.

UNBLF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as KLPEF (43). This means that UNBLF’s stock grew similarly to KLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

KLPEF's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as UNBLF (99). This means that KLPEF’s stock grew similarly to UNBLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KLPEFUNBLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KLPEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBIB25.370.01
+0.04%
iShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term Tips ETF
NANR58.81-0.01
-0.01%
SPDR S&P® North American Natural Res ETF
KRBN30.23-0.06
-0.20%
KraneShares Global Carbon ETF
AVLV70.60-0.23
-0.32%
Avantis US Large Cap Value ETF
IPB25.73-0.62
-2.35%
Merrill Lynch Depositor

UNBLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UNBLF and GMRE have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UNBLF and GMRE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNBLF
1D Price
Change %
UNBLF100%
N/A
GMRE - UNBLF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
PLYM - UNBLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
NSA - UNBLF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
EXR - UNBLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
EPRT - UNBLF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
More