KMBIF
Price
$12.77
Change
+$1.47 (+13.01%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
575.38M
MCHVF
Price
$1.58
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 18 closing price
Capitalization
5.04B
Interact to see
Advertisement

KMBIF vs MCHVF

Header iconKMBIF vs MCHVF Comparison
Open Charts KMBIF vs MCHVFBanner chart's image
Kambi Group
Price$12.77
Change+$1.47 (+13.01%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization575.38M
MGM China Holdings
Price$1.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
Capitalization5.04B
KMBIF vs MCHVF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KMBIF vs. MCHVF commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KMBIF is a Hold and MCHVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (KMBIF: $12.77 vs. MCHVF: $1.58)
Brand notoriety: KMBIF and MCHVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KMBIF: 565% vs. MCHVF: 100%
Market capitalization -- KMBIF: $575.38M vs. MCHVF: $5.04B
KMBIF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $575.38M. MCHVF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $5.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KMBIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KMBIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCHVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KMBIF is a better buy in the long-term than MCHVF.

Price Growth

KMBIF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +13.05% price change this week, while MCHVF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.59%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-0.92% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHVF($5.04B) has a higher market cap than KMBIF($575M). MCHVF YTD gains are higher at: 50.476 vs. KMBIF (33.341). KMBIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 62.6M vs. MCHVF (-1.06B). MCHVF has more cash in the bank: 6.95B vs. KMBIF (68.7M). KMBIF has less debt than MCHVF: KMBIF (20.4M) vs MCHVF (30.6B). MCHVF has higher revenues than KMBIF: MCHVF (7.92B) vs KMBIF (173M).
KMBIFMCHVFKMBIF / MCHVF
Capitalization575M5.04B11%
EBITDA62.6M-1.06B-6%
Gain YTD33.34150.47666%
P/E Ratio23.87N/A-
Revenue173M7.92B2%
Total Cash68.7M6.95B1%
Total Debt20.4M30.6B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KMBIF vs MCHVF: Fundamental Ratings
KMBIF
MCHVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3642
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10075
SMR RATING
1..100
7699
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3842
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2394
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMBIF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHVF (63). This means that KMBIF’s stock grew similarly to MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as KMBIF (100). This means that MCHVF’s stock grew similarly to KMBIF’s over the last 12 months.

KMBIF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHVF (99). This means that KMBIF’s stock grew similarly to MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

KMBIF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHVF (42). This means that KMBIF’s stock grew similarly to MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

KMBIF's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCHVF (94). This means that KMBIF’s stock grew significantly faster than MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
POVSX29.69N/A
N/A
Putnam International Equity A
LOGSX20.56N/A
N/A
Live Oak Health Sciences
ABYSX20.41N/A
N/A
AB Discovery Value Advisor
AKREX69.19N/A
N/A
Akre Focus Retail
OEQIX8.34N/A
N/A
Oaktree Emerging Markets Equity I

KMBIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KMBIF and ARHN have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMBIF and ARHN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMBIF
1D Price
Change %
KMBIF100%
N/A
ARHN - KMBIF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRKZF - KMBIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVF - KMBIF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LFDJF - KMBIF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
GXYYY - KMBIF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
More

MCHVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHVF has been loosely correlated with SKYZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHVF jumps, then SKYZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHVF
1D Price
Change %
MCHVF100%
N/A
SKYZF - MCHVF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SCHYF - MCHVF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVY - MCHVF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYYY - MCHVF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
GXYEF - MCHVF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More