It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KMPR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KMPR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while L’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
KMPR (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.50% price change this week, while L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +1.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.91%.
KMPR is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2025.
L is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
KMPR | L | KMPR / L | |
Capitalization | 3.91B | 17.4B | 22% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 37.905 | 22.247 | 170% |
P/E Ratio | 42.55 | 12.32 | 345% |
Revenue | 4.92B | 15.7B | 31% |
Total Cash | 587M | 45.2B | 1% |
Total Debt | 1.39B | 9B | 15% |
KMPR | L | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 55 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KMPR's Valuation (55) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as L (69) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that KMPR’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.
L's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for KMPR (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew significantly faster than KMPR’s over the last 12 months.
KMPR's SMR Rating (90) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as L (98) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that KMPR’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.
L's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as KMPR (48) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to KMPR’s over the last 12 months.
L's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KMPR (99) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than KMPR’s over the last 12 months.
KMPR | L | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago57% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago64% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago34% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago57% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago50% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago57% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago68% | 7 days ago45% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago63% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMPR has been loosely correlated with THG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KMPR jumps, then THG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KMPR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KMPR | 100% | +1.12% | ||
THG - KMPR | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
AXS - KMPR | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
MCY - KMPR | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
L - KMPR | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
SAFT - KMPR | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
More |