It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KMSWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCRAB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KMSWF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCRAB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
KMSWF (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MCRAB (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was +2.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.39%.
Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.
KMSWF | MCRAB | KMSWF / MCRAB | |
Capitalization | 46.3M | 109M | 42% |
EBITDA | N/A | 11.8M | - |
Gain YTD | 48.378 | 2.670 | 1,812% |
P/E Ratio | 25.05 | 13.74 | 182% |
Revenue | N/A | 125M | - |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 169K | - |
KMSWF | MCRAB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 46 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 38 Fair valued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 34 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MCRAB's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as KMSWF (38). This means that MCRAB’s stock grew similarly to KMSWF’s over the last 12 months.
MCRAB's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KMSWF (100). This means that MCRAB’s stock grew significantly faster than KMSWF’s over the last 12 months.
MCRAB's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as KMSWF (88). This means that MCRAB’s stock grew similarly to KMSWF’s over the last 12 months.
KMSWF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as MCRAB (56). This means that KMSWF’s stock grew similarly to MCRAB’s over the last 12 months.
KMSWF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCRAB (49). This means that KMSWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCRAB’s over the last 12 months.
KMSWF | MCRAB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago23% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago16% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago30% | 1 day ago30% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago33% | 1 day ago28% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago26% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that KMSWF and MCRAB have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMSWF and MCRAB's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KMSWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KMSWF | 100% | N/A | ||
MCRAB - KMSWF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PUMSY - KMSWF | 4% Poorly correlated | -2.48% | ||
MONRF - KMSWF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PMMAF - KMSWF | 0% Poorly correlated | -0.88% | ||
MONRY - KMSWF | 0% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MCRAB and HMRZF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCRAB and HMRZF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCRAB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MCRAB | 100% | N/A | ||
HMRZF - MCRAB | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HNNMY - MCRAB | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.02% | ||
MONRF - MCRAB | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
KMSWF - MCRAB | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MONRY - MCRAB | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
More |