KMSWF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.02 (+66.67%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
46.33M
PUMSY
Price
$1.96
Change
-$0.01 (-0.51%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.99B
Interact to see
Advertisement

KMSWF vs PUMSY

Header iconKMSWF vs PUMSY Comparison
Open Charts KMSWF vs PUMSYBanner chart's image
Kingmaker Footwear Holdings
Price$0.05
Change+$0.02 (+66.67%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization46.33M
Puma SE
Price$1.96
Change-$0.01 (-0.51%)
Volume$26.15K
Capitalization2.99B
KMSWF vs PUMSY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KMSWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUMSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KMSWF vs. PUMSY commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KMSWF is a Hold and PUMSY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (KMSWF: $0.05 vs. PUMSY: $1.96)
Brand notoriety: KMSWF and PUMSY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wholesale Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KMSWF: 100% vs. PUMSY: 33%
Market capitalization -- KMSWF: $46.33M vs. PUMSY: $2.99B
KMSWF [@Wholesale Distributors] is valued at $46.33M. PUMSY’s [@Wholesale Distributors] market capitalization is $2.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry ranges from $113.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry is $8.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KMSWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePUMSY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KMSWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PUMSY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KMSWF is a better buy in the long-term than PUMSY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KMSWF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUMSY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KMSWF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • PUMSY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KMSWF is a better buy in the short-term than PUMSY.

Price Growth

KMSWF (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PUMSY (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was -5.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was +3.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wholesale Distributors (+3.98% weekly)

Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PUMSY($2.99B) has a higher market cap than KMSWF($46.3M). KMSWF has higher P/E ratio than PUMSY: KMSWF (25.05) vs PUMSY (13.76). KMSWF YTD gains are higher at: 48.378 vs. PUMSY (-54.231).
KMSWFPUMSYKMSWF / PUMSY
Capitalization46.3M2.99B2%
EBITDAN/A377M-
Gain YTD48.378-54.231-89%
P/E Ratio25.0513.76182%
RevenueN/A8.62B-
Total CashN/A293M-
Total DebtN/A2.58B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KMSWF vs PUMSY: Fundamental Ratings
KMSWF
PUMSY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3659
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8791
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5491
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
693
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PUMSY's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as KMSWF (38). This means that PUMSY’s stock grew similarly to KMSWF’s over the last 12 months.

PUMSY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KMSWF (100). This means that PUMSY’s stock grew similarly to KMSWF’s over the last 12 months.

KMSWF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as PUMSY (91). This means that KMSWF’s stock grew similarly to PUMSY’s over the last 12 months.

KMSWF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PUMSY (91). This means that KMSWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PUMSY’s over the last 12 months.

KMSWF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PUMSY (93). This means that KMSWF’s stock grew significantly faster than PUMSY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KMSWFPUMSY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KMSWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUMSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QUASX62.80N/A
N/A
AB Small Cap Growth A
HNCYX21.21N/A
N/A
Hartford International Growth Y
IAXAX7.92N/A
N/A
VY® T. Rowe Price Divers Mid Cap Gr A
DHINX13.43N/A
N/A
Centre Global Infrastructure Investor
RGBHX40.42-0.01
-0.02%
American Funds Global Balanced R5E

KMSWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KMSWF and MCRAB have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMSWF and MCRAB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMSWF
1D Price
Change %
KMSWF100%
N/A
MCRAB - KMSWF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PUMSY - KMSWF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
MONRF - KMSWF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMMAF - KMSWF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MONRY - KMSWF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
More

PUMSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PUMSY has been loosely correlated with ADDYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PUMSY jumps, then ADDYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUMSY
1D Price
Change %
PUMSY100%
-0.51%
ADDYY - PUMSY
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
PMMAF - PUMSY
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WWW - PUMSY
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
SGC - PUMSY
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
ADDDF - PUMSY
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.15%
More