KMSWF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.07 (-70.00%)
Updated
Dec 6 closing price
Capitalization
78.58M
PUMSY
Price
$4.10
Change
-$0.04 (-0.97%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
10.08B
Ad is loading...

KMSWF vs PUMSY

Header iconKMSWF vs PUMSY Comparison
Open Charts KMSWF vs PUMSYBanner chart's image
Kingmaker Footwear Holdings
Price$0.03
Change-$0.07 (-70.00%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization78.58M
Puma SE
Price$4.10
Change-$0.04 (-0.97%)
Volume$266.78K
Capitalization10.08B
KMSWF vs PUMSY Comparison Chart
Loading...
KMSWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUMSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KMSWF vs. PUMSY commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KMSWF is a Hold and PUMSY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (KMSWF: $0.03 vs. PUMSY: $4.10)
Brand notoriety: KMSWF and PUMSY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KMSWF: 117% vs. PUMSY: 50%
Market capitalization -- KMSWF: $78.58M vs. PUMSY: $10.08B
KMSWF [@Apparel/Footwear] is valued at $78.58M. PUMSY’s [@Apparel/Footwear] market capitalization is $10.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry ranges from $140.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $6.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KMSWF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePUMSY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KMSWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PUMSY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both KMSWF and PUMSY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KMSWF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUMSY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KMSWF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PUMSY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PUMSY is a better buy in the short-term than KMSWF.

Price Growth

KMSWF (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PUMSY (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was -5.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was +0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.23%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear (+0.11% weekly)

Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PUMSY($10.1B) has a higher market cap than KMSWF($78.6M). PUMSY has higher P/E ratio than KMSWF: PUMSY (25.64) vs KMSWF (22.42). KMSWF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. PUMSY (-9.492). PUMSY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 655M vs. KMSWF (12.6M). KMSWF has more cash in the bank: 311M vs. PUMSY (289M). KMSWF has less debt than PUMSY: KMSWF (17.2M) vs PUMSY (1.21B). PUMSY has higher revenues than KMSWF: PUMSY (8.74B) vs KMSWF (1.1B).
KMSWFPUMSYKMSWF / PUMSY
Capitalization78.6M10.1B1%
EBITDA12.6M655M2%
Gain YTD0.000-9.492-
P/E Ratio22.4225.6487%
Revenue1.1B8.74B13%
Total Cash311M289M108%
Total Debt17.2M1.21B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KMSWF vs PUMSY: Fundamental Ratings
KMSWF
PUMSY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8770
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9478
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
642
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMSWF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as PUMSY (39). This means that KMSWF’s stock grew similarly to PUMSY’s over the last 12 months.

KMSWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PUMSY (100). This means that KMSWF’s stock grew similarly to PUMSY’s over the last 12 months.

PUMSY's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as KMSWF (87). This means that PUMSY’s stock grew similarly to KMSWF’s over the last 12 months.

PUMSY's Price Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as KMSWF (94). This means that PUMSY’s stock grew similarly to KMSWF’s over the last 12 months.

KMSWF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PUMSY (42). This means that KMSWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PUMSY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KMSWFPUMSY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
22%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
21%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
39%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KMSWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUMSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MXL24.051.44
+6.37%
MaxLinear
OCFT2.860.13
+4.58%
OneConnect Financial Technology Co Ltd
PVH92.780.58
+0.63%
PVH Corp
LAW4.93N/A
N/A
CS Disco
ALPACA.X0.160419-0.010434
-6.11%
Alpaca Finance cryptocurrency

KMSWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KMSWF and MCRAB have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMSWF and MCRAB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMSWF
1D Price
Change %
KMSWF100%
N/A
MCRAB - KMSWF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PUMSY - KMSWF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
MONRF - KMSWF
3%
Poorly correlated
+7.22%
PMMAF - KMSWF
0%
Poorly correlated
-2.95%
MONRY - KMSWF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
More

PUMSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PUMSY has been loosely correlated with ADDYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PUMSY jumps, then ADDYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUMSY
1D Price
Change %
PUMSY100%
-0.97%
ADDYY - PUMSY
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
PMMAF - PUMSY
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.95%
WWW - PUMSY
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
SGC - PUMSY
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
ADDDF - PUMSY
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
More