KNAMF
Price
$137.90
Change
+$2.67 (+1.97%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
7.67B
LCHD
Price
$0.03
Change
+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
20.65M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KNAMF vs LCHD

Header iconKNAMF vs LCHD Comparison
Open Charts KNAMF vs LCHDBanner chart's image
KONAMI GROUP
Price$137.90
Change+$2.67 (+1.97%)
Volume$190
Capitalization7.67B
Leader Capital Holdings
Price$0.03
Change+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Volume$150
Capitalization20.65M
KNAMF vs LCHD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KNAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LCHD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KNAMF vs. LCHD commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KNAMF is a Buy and LCHD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (KNAMF: $137.90 vs. LCHD: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: KNAMF and LCHD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KNAMF: 16% vs. LCHD: 56%
Market capitalization -- KNAMF: $7.67B vs. LCHD: $20.65M
KNAMF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $7.67B. LCHD’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $20.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KNAMF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLCHD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KNAMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LCHD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KNAMF is a better buy in the long-term than LCHD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KNAMF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LCHD’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KNAMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • LCHD’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KNAMF is a better buy in the short-term than LCHD.

Price Growth

KNAMF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LCHD (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.33% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KNAMF($7.67B) has a higher market cap than LCHD($20.6M). KNAMF YTD gains are higher at: 123.248 vs. LCHD (-58.571). KNAMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 78B vs. LCHD (-11.94M). KNAMF has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. LCHD (299K). LCHD has less debt than KNAMF: LCHD (1.41M) vs KNAMF (59.8B). KNAMF has higher revenues than LCHD: KNAMF (311B) vs LCHD (173K).
KNAMFLCHDKNAMF / LCHD
Capitalization7.67B20.6M37,252%
EBITDA78B-11.94M-653,531%
Gain YTD123.248-58.571-210%
P/E Ratio30.03N/A-
Revenue311B173K179,768,786%
Total Cash209B299K69,899,666%
Total Debt59.8B1.41M4,241,135%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KNAMF vs LCHD: Fundamental Ratings
KNAMF
LCHD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5023
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5100
SMR RATING
1..100
50100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a45

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KNAMF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LCHD (99). This means that KNAMF’s stock grew significantly faster than LCHD’s over the last 12 months.

KNAMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LCHD (100). This means that KNAMF’s stock grew significantly faster than LCHD’s over the last 12 months.

KNAMF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LCHD (100). This means that KNAMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LCHD’s over the last 12 months.

KNAMF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as LCHD (43). This means that KNAMF’s stock grew similarly to LCHD’s over the last 12 months.

KNAMF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LCHD (100). This means that KNAMF’s stock grew significantly faster than LCHD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KNAMFLCHD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KNAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LCHD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QQQA45.190.36
+0.80%
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Drsy Wght Momt ETF
DNOV45.490.10
+0.21%
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Nov
EQWL112.200.22
+0.20%
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF
COMB21.31-0.22
-1.01%
GraniteShares Blmbrg CmdtyBrdStr NoK1ETF
INTW16.47-3.40
-17.09%
GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF

KNAMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KNAMF has been loosely correlated with NEXOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KNAMF jumps, then NEXOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KNAMF
1D Price
Change %
KNAMF100%
N/A
NEXOY - KNAMF
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.64%
NEXOF - KNAMF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BTRCF - KNAMF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
JGHG - KNAMF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DGNOF - KNAMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.80%
More

LCHD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LCHD and KNAMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LCHD and KNAMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LCHD
1D Price
Change %
LCHD100%
N/A
KNAMF - LCHD
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRUG - LCHD
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.79%
ZETA - LCHD
12%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
OHCS - LCHD
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YMM - LCHD
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.38%
More