KNRLF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
6.26M
KTHGF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
7.71M
Ad is loading...

KNRLF vs KTHGF

Header iconKNRLF vs KTHGF Comparison
Open Charts KNRLF vs KTHGFBanner chart's image
Kontrol Technologies
Price$0.11
Change-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Volume$16.97K
Capitalization6.26M
Kantone Holdings
Price$0.05
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$1.3K
Capitalization7.71M
KNRLF vs KTHGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
KNRLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KNRLF vs. KTHGF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KNRLF is a Hold and KTHGF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (KNRLF: $0.11 vs. KTHGF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: KNRLF and KTHGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KNRLF: 56% vs. KTHGF: 100%
Market capitalization -- KNRLF: $6.26M vs. KTHGF: $7.71M
KNRLF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $6.26M. KTHGF’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $7.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $220.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $9.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KNRLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKTHGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KNRLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KTHGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KTHGF is a better buy in the long-term than KNRLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KNRLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • KNRLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

KNRLF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -11.99% price change this week, while KTHGF (@Information Technology Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (+0.43% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KTHGF($7.71M) has a higher market cap than KNRLF($6.26M). KTHGF has higher P/E ratio than KNRLF: KTHGF (16.79) vs KNRLF (0.99). KTHGF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. KNRLF (-8.250).
KNRLFKTHGFKNRLF / KTHGF
Capitalization6.26M7.71M81%
EBITDA13.7MN/A-
Gain YTD-8.2500.000-
P/E Ratio0.9916.796%
Revenue14.3MN/A-
Total Cash11.6MN/A-
Total Debt337KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KNRLF vs KTHGF: Fundamental Ratings
KNRLF
KTHGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1287
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8851
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10012
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KNRLF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as KTHGF (46). This means that KNRLF’s stock grew similarly to KTHGF’s over the last 12 months.

KNRLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KTHGF (100). This means that KNRLF’s stock grew similarly to KTHGF’s over the last 12 months.

KNRLF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KTHGF (87). This means that KNRLF’s stock grew significantly faster than KTHGF’s over the last 12 months.

KTHGF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KNRLF (88). This means that KTHGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KNRLF’s over the last 12 months.

KTHGF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KNRLF (100). This means that KTHGF’s stock grew significantly faster than KNRLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KNRLFKTHGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
81%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KNRLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNNEX60.060.54
+0.91%
American Funds New Economy R2E
RMOMX23.590.14
+0.60%
Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Member
LICYX14.830.08
+0.54%
Lord Abbett International Equity I
MWOJX62.970.26
+0.41%
MFS Global Growth R4
COSZX10.690.03
+0.28%
Columbia Overseas Value Inst

KNRLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KNRLF and CRAYF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KNRLF and CRAYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KNRLF
1D Price
Change %
KNRLF100%
-4.26%
CRAYF - KNRLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPOFF - KNRLF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
FJTSF - KNRLF
10%
Poorly correlated
-6.94%
FDRVF - KNRLF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KTHGF - KNRLF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KTHGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KTHGF and KNRLF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KTHGF and KNRLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KTHGF
1D Price
Change %
KTHGF100%
N/A
KNRLF - KTHGF
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.26%
SPOFF - KTHGF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
EAXR - KTHGF
1%
Poorly correlated
-9.40%
FDRVF - KTHGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLTEF - KTHGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More