Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KNTAX vs RMUYX
KNTAX vs RMUYX Comparison
Open Charts KNTAX vs RMUYX
DWS New York Tax-Free Income A
Price$9.61
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets173.38M
Invesco Rochester® New York Municipals Y
Price$14.24
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.01B
KNTAX vs RMUYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KNTAX vs. RMUYX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KNTAX is a Buy and RMUYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMUYX has more cash in the bank: 4.01B vs. KNTAX (173M). RMUYX pays higher dividends than KNTAX: RMUYX (4.08) vs KNTAX (3.26). KNTAX was incepted earlier than RMUYX: KNTAX (40 years) vs RMUYX (25 years). KNTAX (1.04) and RMUYX (1.03) have similar cost to investors . KNTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RMUYX (13.00). KNTAX (1000) and RMUYX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. KNTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.86 vs. RMUYX (-4.50). RMUYX return over 5 years is better than : 3.31 vs. KNTAX (1.22).
| KNTAX | RMUYX | KNTAX / RMUYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.03 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.03 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.858 | -3.517 | 24% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 173M | 4.01B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 4.08 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.86 | -4.50 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.65 | 8.71 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.22 | 3.31 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.08 | 37.13 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement