It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KNTK’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KNTK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
KNTK (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +1.30% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -5.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.04%.
KNTK is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
KNTK | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KNTK | WBIF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 2 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago74% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago75% | 24 days ago72% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago68% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KNTK has been loosely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KNTK jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KNTK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KNTK | 100% | -0.46% | ||
OKE - KNTK | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
WMB - KNTK | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
TRGP - KNTK | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
KMI - KNTK | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
PAGP - KNTK | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WBIF has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WBIF jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WBIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
WBIF | 100% | -0.68% | ||
JHG - WBIF | 67% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
CARR - WBIF | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
KNTK - WBIF | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
TW - WBIF | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
JNJ - WBIF | 17% Poorly correlated | +1.78% | ||
More |