Advertisement
KO vs PEP
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Coca-Cola (KO) vs. PepsiCo (PEP) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- KO shows a slight YTD (year-to-date) edge at around 10% versus PEP's approximately 9%, reflecting steady consumer staples demand.
- PEP offers a higher dividend yield of 3.66% compared to KO's 2.69%, appealing to income-focused investors.
- Both exhibit low betas (volatility relative to the market)—KO at 0.36 and PEP at 0.41—providing defensive positioning in volatile markets.
- Recent month performance favors KO with a 0.5% gain versus PEP's 0.9% decline, amid broader stability.
- PEP gained from Q1 earnings volume recovery via snack price cuts and a Google Cloud partnership, boosting sentiment.
- Analyst targets indicate upside: KO around $84, PEP near $172.
Introduction
Coca-Cola (KO) and PepsiCo (PEP) stand as iconic rivals in the beverage sector, dominating global nonalcoholic drink sales while PEP adds significant snack exposure through brands like Frito-Lay. This KO vs. PEP stock comparison examines their relative performance, business models, and market positioning in the current environment. Investors seeking stable dividend payers and consumer staples resilience amid economic uncertainty, as well as traders eyeing relative momentum, will find value in understanding their contrasts and synergies. Both deliver consistent cash flows, but diverging growth drivers and recent catalysts shape their trajectories.
KO Overview and Recent Performance
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) operates as a global leader in nonalcoholic beverages, leveraging a franchised bottling model for asset-light efficiency. Its portfolio spans sodas, waters, juices, and teas sold worldwide. In recent market activity, KO has demonstrated resilience, posting modest gains over the past month around 0.5% and strong YTD returns near 10%. Trading near $76.60 with a market cap exceeding $329 billion, it trades at a P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of 25.2. Sentiment benefits from its low beta of 0.36 and reliable dividends, reinforced by analyst buy ratings and plans for investments in emerging markets like South Africa by 2030. Upcoming earnings are viewed as poised for in-line results despite macro volatility, supporting steady performance driven by pricing discipline and volume stability.
PEP Overview and Recent Performance
PepsiCo (PEP), a diversified powerhouse, combines beverages like Pepsi and Gatorade with powerhouse snacks via Frito-Lay and Quaker Oats. This broader portfolio enhances resilience against beverage-specific headwinds. Recent weeks saw PEP navigate a slight monthly dip of 0.9%, with YTD gains around 9% and shares near $155, backed by a $212 billion market cap and P/E of 24.4. Key positives include Q1 earnings highlighting volume recovery from snack price reductions, such as on Doritos, alongside a multi-year Google Cloud deal for AI-driven supply chain upgrades. Its beta of 0.41 underscores stability, with Barclays raising its price target amid improving trends.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from over 350 AI trading bots that generate real-time signals across thousands of stocks, ETFs, and cryptos. Only 25 bots earn a spot in this dynamic section, selected by AI analysis of current market conditions, industries, and performance metrics like win rates (often 60-80%), profit factors exceeding 1.5, and thousands of historical trades over various timeframes from intraday to long-term. These bots employ diverse strategies—scalping, swing trading, trend-following—tailored to specific tickers and risk profiles. In today's volatile environment, they highlight opportunities in trending sectors. Traders can copy signals via Signal Agents (no minimums), Virtual Agents (risk-managed simulations), or Brokerage Agents. Visit the Trending AI Robots page to discover bots suited to your style and enhance decision-making with data-driven insights.
Head-to-Head Comparison
In business models, KO's asset-light franchising contrasts PEP's integrated manufacturing and distribution, offering PEP greater control but higher capital intensity. Growth drivers diverge: KO relies on beverage volume and pricing amid health trends, while PEP leverages snacks for diversification, with recent protein initiatives and pricing adjustments fueling volume. Recent momentum tilts to KO's short-term gains, but PEP shows catalysts like earnings beats. Risk factors are muted for both, with low betas and strong balance sheets, though PEP faces snack pricing pressures. Sector exposure favors PEP's broader consumer staples footprint. Market sentiment remains bullish, with comparable analyst support but PEP's higher yield drawing income seekers in uncertain times.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward KO in this stock comparison, citing its superior recent momentum, higher YTD returns, and trend consistency amid defensive demand. While PEP excels in yield and diversification, KO's lower volatility and stable positioning offer probabilistic edge in the prevailing market environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KO is a Hold and PEP is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePEP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- KO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- PEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PEP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
KO (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +3.95% price change this week, while PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +1.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
KO is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
PEP is expected to report earnings on Jul 09, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.90% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| KO | PEP | KO / PEP | |
| Capitalization | 355B | 197B | 180% |
| EBITDA | 19.2B | 16.3B | 118% |
| Gain YTD | 18.993 | 2.487 | 764% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.98 | 22.65 | 115% |
| Revenue | 49.3B | 95.4B | 52% |
| Total Cash | 13.8B | 10.8B | 128% |
| Total Debt | 43.9B | 52.7B | 83% |
KO | PEP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | 22 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PEP's Valuation (19) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KO (56). This means that PEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than KO’s over the last 12 months.
KO's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for PEP (75). This means that KO’s stock grew significantly faster than PEP’s over the last 12 months.
KO's SMR Rating (21) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PEP (22). This means that KO’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.
KO's Price Growth Rating (28) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PEP (58). This means that KO’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KO (62). This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to KO’s over the last 12 months.
| KO | PEP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 26% | 4 days ago 38% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 35% | 4 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 35% | 4 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 40% | 4 days ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 38% | 4 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 41% | 6 days ago 40% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 30% | 15 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 22% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 29% | 4 days ago 36% |
Advertisement
KO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KO has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KO jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
PEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEP has been loosely correlated with KDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEP jumps, then KDP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEP | 100% | +0.38% | ||
| KDP - PEP | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| FIZZ - PEP | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| CCEP - PEP | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| COKE - PEP | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.85% | ||
| MNST - PEP | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
More | ||||