KOS
Price
$3.18
Change
-$0.17 (-5.07%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.76B
One day until earnings call
TAOIF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
76.34M
Ad is loading...

KOS vs TAOIF

Header iconKOS vs TAOIF Comparison
Open Charts KOS vs TAOIFBanner chart's image
Kosmos Energy
Price$3.18
Change-$0.17 (-5.07%)
Volume$8.42M
Capitalization2.76B
TAG Oil
Price$0.08
Change-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Volume$82.9K
Capitalization76.34M
KOS vs TAOIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
KOS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KOS vs. TAOIF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KOS is a Hold and TAOIF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (KOS: $3.18 vs. TAOIF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: KOS and TAOIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KOS: 103% vs. TAOIF: 125%
Market capitalization -- KOS: $2.76B vs. TAOIF: $76.34M
KOS [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $2.76B. TAOIF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $76.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KOS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTAOIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KOS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TAOIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KOS is a better buy in the long-term than TAOIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KOS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • KOS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

KOS (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +1.27% price change this week, while TAOIF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -7.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

KOS is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-1.25% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KOS($2.76B) has a higher market cap than TAOIF($76.3M). KOS YTD gains are higher at: -7.018 vs. TAOIF (-14.103). KOS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 931M vs. TAOIF (-5.31M). KOS has more cash in the bank: 95.3M vs. TAOIF (22.2M). TAOIF has less debt than KOS: TAOIF (498K) vs KOS (2.39B). KOS has higher revenues than TAOIF: KOS (1.7B) vs TAOIF (0).
KOSTAOIFKOS / TAOIF
Capitalization2.76B76.3M3,621%
EBITDA931M-5.31M-17,546%
Gain YTD-7.018-14.10350%
P/E Ratio13.32N/A-
Revenue1.7B0-
Total Cash95.3M22.2M429%
Total Debt2.39B498K480,120%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KOS vs TAOIF: Fundamental Ratings
KOS
TAOIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4793
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8695
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9997
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TAOIF's Valuation (63) in the null industry is in the same range as KOS (73) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that TAOIF’s stock grew similarly to KOS’s over the last 12 months.

TAOIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KOS (100) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that TAOIF’s stock grew similarly to KOS’s over the last 12 months.

KOS's SMR Rating (47) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAOIF (93) in the null industry. This means that KOS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAOIF’s over the last 12 months.

KOS's Price Growth Rating (86) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as TAOIF (95) in the null industry. This means that KOS’s stock grew similarly to TAOIF’s over the last 12 months.

TAOIF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as KOS (99) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that TAOIF’s stock grew similarly to KOS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KOS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KOS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DEMSX23.44-0.12
-0.51%
DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap I
GEGCX13.92-0.09
-0.64%
abrdn Emerging Markets C
BTLKX8.85-0.07
-0.78%
Baillie Gifford Intl Concntr Gr EqsK
MUOIX30.47-0.53
-1.71%
Morgan Stanley Instl US Core I
CAFCX34.77-0.75
-2.11%
American Funds AMCAP 529C

TAOIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TAOIF and ROKRF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAOIF and ROKRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAOIF
1D Price
Change %
TAOIF100%
-5.10%
ROKRF - TAOIF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VRN - TAOIF
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.66%
PREKF - TAOIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.47%
KOS - TAOIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.07%
MEGEF - TAOIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.13%
More