KPCUF
Price
$4.76
Change
+$1.21 (+34.08%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
11.92B
PFSB
Price
$11.99
Change
+$0.03 (+0.25%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
19.77M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KPCUF vs PFSB

Header iconKPCUF vs PFSB Comparison
Open Charts KPCUF vs PFSBBanner chart's image
KASIKORNBANK Public
Price$4.76
Change+$1.21 (+34.08%)
Volume$100
Capitalization11.92B
PFS Ban
Price$11.99
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
Volume$1.19K
Capitalization19.77M
KPCUF vs PFSB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PFSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KPCUF vs. PFSB commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KPCUF is a Buy and PFSB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (KPCUF: $4.76 vs. PFSB: $11.99)
Brand notoriety: KPCUF and PFSB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KPCUF: 100% vs. PFSB: 39%
Market capitalization -- KPCUF: $11.92B vs. PFSB: $19.77M
KPCUF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.92B. PFSB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $19.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KPCUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePFSB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KPCUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PFSB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KPCUF is a better buy in the long-term than PFSB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFSB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PFSB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

KPCUF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PFSB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KPCUF($11.9B) has a higher market cap than PFSB($19.8M). PFSB has higher P/E ratio than KPCUF: PFSB (17.63) vs KPCUF (7.63). KPCUF YTD gains are higher at: 34.077 vs. PFSB (8.018). KPCUF has higher revenues than PFSB: KPCUF (208B) vs PFSB (6.17M).
KPCUFPFSBKPCUF / PFSB
Capitalization11.9B19.8M60,101%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD34.0778.018425%
P/E Ratio7.6317.6343%
Revenue208B6.17M3,371,151%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt254BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KPCUF: Fundamental Ratings
KPCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
39
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KPCUFPFSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
33%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLSPF8.220.25
+3.07%
Melrose Industries PLC
CEBTF0.02N/A
N/A
Citychamp Watch & Jewellery Group Ltd.
FKMCF0.11N/A
N/A
FOKUS MNG CORP.
KPLIF0.27N/A
N/A
Keppel Infrastructure Trust
AILIM77.75N/A
N/A
Ameren Illinois Company

KPCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KPCUF and FFWC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KPCUF and FFWC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KPCUF
1D Price
Change %
KPCUF100%
N/A
FFWC - KPCUF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
EQGPF - KPCUF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSDK - KPCUF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - KPCUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFSB - KPCUF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
More

PFSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PFSB and MBIN have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PFSB and MBIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFSB
1D Price
Change %
PFSB100%
+0.23%
MBIN - PFSB
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
EFSI - PFSB
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
BAP - PFSB
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
CCB - PFSB
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
BNPQY - PFSB
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
More