KPCUF
Price
$3.55
Change
+$0.19 (+5.65%)
Updated
May 3 closing price
PFSB
Price
$11.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

KPCUF vs PFSB

Header iconKPCUF vs PFSB Comparison
Open Charts KPCUF vs PFSBBanner chart's image
KASIKORNBANK Public
Price$3.55
Change+$0.19 (+5.65%)
Volume$2.96K
CapitalizationN/A
PFS Ban
Price$11.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
KPCUF vs PFSB Comparison Chart
Loading...
KPCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KPCUF vs. PFSB commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KPCUF is a Buy and PFSB is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (KPCUF: $3.55 vs. PFSB: $11.10)
Brand notoriety: KPCUF and PFSB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KPCUF: 100% vs. PFSB: 2%
Market capitalization -- KPCUF: $8.71B vs. PFSB: $0
KPCUF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $8.71B. PFSB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KPCUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePFSB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KPCUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PFSB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFSB is a better buy in the long-term than KPCUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KPCUF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFSB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KPCUF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • PFSB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both KPCUF and PFSB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

KPCUF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PFSB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFSB YTD gains are higher at: 17.460 vs. KPCUF (-6.203).
KPCUFPFSBKPCUF / PFSB
Capitalization8.71BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.20317.460-36%
P/E Ratio8.42N/A-
Revenue180BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt254BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KPCUF: Fundamental Ratings
KPCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
45
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
70
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KPCUFPFSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
36%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
5%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KPCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNMWX14.36N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Trm W
MRFOX32.31-0.15
-0.46%
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity
SSGFX58.39-0.39
-0.66%
Sextant Growth
MASKX25.52-0.30
-1.16%
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Idx Instl
CNGCX52.75-6.25
-10.59%
American Funds New Economy 529C

KPCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KPCUF and FFWC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KPCUF and FFWC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KPCUF
1D Price
Change %
KPCUF100%
N/A
FFWC - KPCUF
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
EQGPF - KPCUF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSDK - KPCUF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - KPCUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFSB - KPCUF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PFSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PFSB and MBIN have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PFSB and MBIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFSB
1D Price
Change %
PFSB100%
N/A
MBIN - PFSB
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
EFSI - PFSB
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
BAP - PFSB
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
CCB - PFSB
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.50%
BNPQY - PFSB
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
More