KRMCF
Price
$0.44
Change
+$0.11 (+33.33%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
20.17M
PYCFF
Price
$1.69
Change
+$0.20 (+13.42%)
Updated
Dec 9 closing price
Capitalization
38.01M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KRMCF vs PYCFF

Header iconKRMCF vs PYCFF Comparison
Open Charts KRMCF vs PYCFFBanner chart's image
KRM22
Price$0.44
Change+$0.11 (+33.33%)
Volume$4.45K
Capitalization20.17M
Mount Logan Cap
Price$1.69
Change+$0.20 (+13.42%)
Volume$29K
Capitalization38.01M
KRMCF vs PYCFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KRMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KRMCF vs. PYCFF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KRMCF is a Hold and PYCFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (KRMCF: $0.44 vs. PYCFF: $1.69)
Brand notoriety: KRMCF and PYCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KRMCF: 91% vs. PYCFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- KRMCF: $20.17M vs. PYCFF: $38.01M
KRMCF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $20.17M. PYCFF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $38.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KRMCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePYCFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KRMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PYCFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PYCFF is a better buy in the long-term than KRMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KRMCF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • KRMCF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

KRMCF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PYCFF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PYCFF($38M) has a higher market cap than KRMCF($20.2M). KRMCF YTD gains are higher at: 10.000 vs. PYCFF (0.000). KRMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -567K vs. PYCFF (-8.84M). PYCFF has more cash in the bank: 200M vs. KRMCF (3.56M). KRMCF has less debt than PYCFF: KRMCF (3.64M) vs PYCFF (76.3M). PYCFF has higher revenues than KRMCF: PYCFF (183M) vs KRMCF (3.88M).
KRMCFPYCFFKRMCF / PYCFF
Capitalization20.2M38M53%
EBITDA-567K-8.84M6%
Gain YTD10.0000.000-
P/E RatioN/A2.05-
Revenue3.88M183M2%
Total Cash3.56M200M2%
Total Debt3.64M76.3M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PYCFF: Fundamental Ratings
PYCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KRMCFPYCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KRMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLPHF8.41N/A
N/A
CLP Holdings Ltd.
CBAF28.35N/A
N/A
Citba Financial Corp.
NRTZF11.18N/A
N/A
Noritz Corp.
KBYPF37.43N/A
N/A
Kobayashi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
KGLDF0.54-0.01
-0.96%
King Global Ventures Inc.

KRMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRMCF has been loosely correlated with QUILF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KRMCF jumps, then QUILF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KRMCF
1D Price
Change %
KRMCF100%
N/A
QUILF - KRMCF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
JFHHF - KRMCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVTBF - KRMCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WNMLA - KRMCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PYCFF - KRMCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PYCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PYCFF and GCMG have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PYCFF and GCMG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PYCFF
1D Price
Change %
PYCFF100%
N/A
GCMG - PYCFF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
GBLBF - PYCFF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WNDLF - PYCFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JFHHF - PYCFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVTBF - PYCFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More