It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KRP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePRT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KRP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRT’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).
KRP (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -4.77% price change this week, while PRT (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +1.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.87%.
KRP is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
PRT is expected to report earnings on Nov 27, 2024.
The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
KRP | PRT | KRP / PRT | |
Capitalization | 1.16B | 50.9M | 2,285% |
EBITDA | 210M | 8.12M | 2,585% |
Gain YTD | 15.383 | -2.898 | -531% |
P/E Ratio | 17.32 | 6.27 | 276% |
Revenue | 273M | 9.03M | 3,023% |
Total Cash | 31M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 296M | N/A | - |
KRP | PRT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 43 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PRT's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as KRP (25) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that PRT’s stock grew similarly to KRP’s over the last 12 months.
KRP's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRT (100) in the null industry. This means that KRP’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRT’s over the last 12 months.
PRT's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as KRP (81) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that PRT’s stock grew similarly to KRP’s over the last 12 months.
KRP's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is in the same range as PRT (56) in the null industry. This means that KRP’s stock grew similarly to PRT’s over the last 12 months.
KRP's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRT (43) in the null industry. This means that KRP’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRT’s over the last 12 months.
KRP | PRT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 3 days ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 3 days ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago54% | 3 days ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago53% | 3 days ago69% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 3 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago63% | 10 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago60% | 14 days ago73% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago65% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago66% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRP has been closely correlated with MGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KRP jumps, then MGY could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that PRT and PR have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRT and PR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PRT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PRT | 100% | -1.00% | ||
PR - PRT | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.50% | ||
ZPTAF - PRT | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.50% | ||
KRP - PRT | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.33% | ||
FRHLF - PRT | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.13% | ||
MEGEF - PRT | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.96% | ||
More |