It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KRUS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTXRH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KRUS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TXRH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
KRUS (@Restaurants) experienced а -4.05% price change this week, while TXRH (@Restaurants) price change was -1.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.80%.
KRUS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
TXRH is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
KRUS | TXRH | KRUS / TXRH | |
Capitalization | 923M | 11B | 8% |
EBITDA | 4.17M | 716M | 1% |
Gain YTD | -15.787 | -7.895 | 200% |
P/E Ratio | 292.35 | 25.05 | 1,167% |
Revenue | 269M | 5.67B | 5% |
Total Cash | 60M | 177M | 34% |
Total Debt | 166M | 923M | 18% |
KRUS | TXRH | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 31 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TXRH's Valuation (62) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KRUS (100) in the null industry. This means that TXRH’s stock grew somewhat faster than KRUS’s over the last 12 months.
TXRH's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as KRUS (51) in the null industry. This means that TXRH’s stock grew similarly to KRUS’s over the last 12 months.
TXRH's SMR Rating (30) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KRUS (93) in the null industry. This means that TXRH’s stock grew somewhat faster than KRUS’s over the last 12 months.
KRUS's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as TXRH (62) in the Restaurants industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew similarly to TXRH’s over the last 12 months.
TXRH's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as KRUS (100) in the null industry. This means that TXRH’s stock grew similarly to KRUS’s over the last 12 months.
KRUS | TXRH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago57% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago58% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago62% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago86% | 27 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago79% | 3 days ago52% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago79% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
RDTE | 33.80 | 0.20 | +0.60% |
Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTECovCllStgyETF | |||
QQQG | 23.35 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Csh CwsGrLdrsETF | |||
DYFI | 23.41 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | |||
RWK | 126.49 | -0.13 | -0.10% |
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF | |||
IJUL | 32.60 | -0.06 | -0.19% |
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF July |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRUS has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KRUS jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KRUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KRUS | 100% | N/A | ||
CAKE - KRUS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
TXRH - KRUS | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
SHAK - KRUS | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
BJRI - KRUS | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
RICK - KRUS | 51% Loosely correlated | -10.39% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TXRH has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TXRH jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TXRH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TXRH | 100% | -0.79% | ||
CAKE - TXRH | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
BJRI - TXRH | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
DRI - TXRH | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
SHAK - TXRH | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
EAT - TXRH | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
More |