KSPHF
Price
$25.10
Change
-$5.18 (-17.11%)
Updated
Oct 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LVRLF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
3.58M
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KSPHF vs LVRLF

Header iconKSPHF vs LVRLF Comparison
Open Charts KSPHF vs LVRLFBanner chart's image
Kissei Pharmaceutical
Price$25.10
Change-$5.18 (-17.11%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.13B
CordovaCann
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization3.58M
KSPHF vs LVRLF Comparison Chart in %
KSPHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LVRLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KSPHF vs. LVRLF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KSPHF is a Hold and LVRLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (KSPHF: $25.10 vs. LVRLF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: KSPHF and LVRLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KSPHF: 174% vs. LVRLF: 1%
Market capitalization -- KSPHF: $1.14B vs. LVRLF: $3.58M
KSPHF [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $1.14B. LVRLF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $3.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $63.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $4.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KSPHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLVRLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KSPHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LVRLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KSPHF is a better buy in the long-term than LVRLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KSPHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LVRLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KSPHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • LVRLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KSPHF is a better buy in the short-term than LVRLF.

Price Growth

KSPHF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LVRLF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was +4.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was -3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

LVRLF is expected to report earnings on Nov 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (-3.77% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KSPHF($1.13B) has a higher market cap than LVRLF($3.58M). KSPHF YTD gains are higher at: 0.400 vs. LVRLF (-18.600).
KSPHFLVRLFKSPHF / LVRLF
Capitalization1.13B3.58M31,608%
EBITDA18.6BN/A-
Gain YTD0.400-18.600-2%
P/E Ratio11.34N/A-
Revenue81.1BN/A-
Total Cash50BN/A-
Total Debt1.26BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KSPHF vs LVRLF: Fundamental Ratings
KSPHF
LVRLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
307
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68100
SMR RATING
1..100
80100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6363
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KSPHF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LVRLF (98). This means that KSPHF’s stock grew significantly faster than LVRLF’s over the last 12 months.

KSPHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as LVRLF (100). This means that KSPHF’s stock grew similarly to LVRLF’s over the last 12 months.

KSPHF's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as LVRLF (100). This means that KSPHF’s stock grew similarly to LVRLF’s over the last 12 months.

KSPHF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as LVRLF (63). This means that KSPHF’s stock grew similarly to LVRLF’s over the last 12 months.

KSPHF's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as LVRLF (100). This means that KSPHF’s stock grew similarly to LVRLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KSPHFLVRLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KSPHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LVRLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPAI4.890.16
+3.38%
Safe Pro Group Inc
FCPT24.070.17
+0.71%
Four Corners Property Trust
SQM59.40-0.07
-0.12%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
NPB15.94-0.50
-3.04%
Northpointe Bancshares Inc
BIAF1.47-0.11
-6.96%
bioAffinity Technologies Inc

KSPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KSPHF and LVRLF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KSPHF and LVRLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KSPHF
1D Price
Change %
KSPHF100%
N/A
LVRLF - KSPHF
5%
Poorly correlated
-11.40%
INDV - KSPHF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.77%
MILFF - KSPHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSTI - KSPHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTSUF - KSPHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LVRLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LVRLF and GNMLF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LVRLF and GNMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVRLF
1D Price
Change %
LVRLF100%
-11.40%
GNMLF - LVRLF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCUJF - LVRLF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
IPSEY - LVRLF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
MEDIF - LVRLF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.96%
KSPHF - LVRLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More