It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KSS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KSS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while M’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
KSS (@Department Stores) experienced а -1.25% price change this week, while M (@Department Stores) price change was -1.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was -3.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.24%.
KSS is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
M is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.
KSS | M | KSS / M | |
Capitalization | 1.58B | 4.51B | 35% |
EBITDA | N/A | 1.24B | - |
Gain YTD | -45.329 | -15.981 | 284% |
P/E Ratio | 6.38 | 26.62 | 24% |
Revenue | N/A | 23.4B | - |
Total Cash | 543M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 7.48B | 6.01B | 124% |
KSS | M | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KSS's Valuation (5) in the Department Stores industry is in the same range as M (10). This means that KSS’s stock grew similarly to M’s over the last 12 months.
M's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Department Stores industry is in the same range as KSS (100). This means that M’s stock grew similarly to KSS’s over the last 12 months.
KSS's SMR Rating (77) in the Department Stores industry is in the same range as M (94). This means that KSS’s stock grew similarly to M’s over the last 12 months.
M's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Department Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KSS (86). This means that M’s stock grew somewhat faster than KSS’s over the last 12 months.
M's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Department Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for KSS (89). This means that M’s stock grew significantly faster than KSS’s over the last 12 months.
KSS | M | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago73% | 6 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 11 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago75% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
PNBAX | 27.64 | 0.34 | +1.25% |
Virtus NFJ Large-Cap Value A | |||
PDSIX | 44.35 | 0.48 | +1.09% |
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index I | |||
NBGTX | 29.32 | 0.28 | +0.96% |
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Tr | |||
FNICX | 30.16 | 0.26 | +0.87% |
Fidelity Advisor New Insights C | |||
GAGIX | 31.04 | 0.22 | +0.71% |
Gabelli Global Rising Income and Div I |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KSS has been loosely correlated with JWN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KSS jumps, then JWN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KSS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KSS | 100% | +2.24% | ||
JWN - KSS | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.95% | ||
M - KSS | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.46% | ||
DDS - KSS | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
SRGHY - KSS | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.34% | ||
MAKSY - KSS | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, M has been loosely correlated with DDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if M jumps, then DDS could also see price increases.