KSS
Price
$15.87
Change
-$0.18 (-1.12%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
1.8B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
M
Price
$23.16
Change
+$0.98 (+4.42%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
6.09B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KSS vs M

Header iconKSS vs M Comparison
Open Charts KSS vs MBanner chart's image
KSS vs M Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Kohl's (KSS) vs. Macy's (M) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Kohl's (KSS) delivered a stronger-than-expected Q1 2026 earnings report in late May, with comparable sales trends improving and the stock surging over 20% intraday before some subsequent consolidation.
  • Macy's (M) has shown relative price stability in recent weeks while awaiting its own Q1 2026 results scheduled for early June, with shares trading higher over the past month compared to broader retail sector weakness.
  • Both companies operate in the challenged department store segment, facing similar pressures from consumer spending patterns and competition, yet differ in recent earnings momentum and valuation positioning.
  • Kohl's (KSS) market capitalization remains smaller, reflecting prior underperformance, while Macy's (M) has maintained a comparatively steadier price trajectory year-to-date.
  • Sector exposure to discretionary retail makes both stocks sensitive to macroeconomic factors such as inflation and employment trends, with limited differentiation in core business models.
  • Relative performance highlights trade-offs between short-term catalyst-driven moves at Kohl's (KSS) and more measured positioning at Macy's (M).

Introduction

Department store operators Kohl's (KSS) and Macy's (M) represent two established players in the U.S. retail sector, each navigating evolving consumer preferences and economic conditions. This comparison examines their recent stock behavior, operational updates, and market positioning to assist traders and investors evaluating relative value within the consumer discretionary space. Portfolio managers and active traders monitoring retail earnings cycles may find the analysis particularly relevant for assessing short-term momentum versus longer-term stability.

Kohl's Overview and Recent Performance

Kohl's Corporation operates a chain of department stores offering apparel, footwear, accessories, beauty products, and home goods, with a focus on proprietary brands and omnichannel capabilities. In recent market activity, the stock experienced notable volatility tied to its Q1 2026 earnings release. The company reported revenue of approximately $3.17 billion, a modest year-over-year decline, alongside a narrower net loss than anticipated. Comparable sales showed the strongest performance in four years, prompting a significant intraday rally of more than 20%. Subsequent trading reflected some profit-taking, though the episode underscored improving operational trends amid ongoing retail headwinds.

M Overview and Recent Performance

Macy's, Inc. runs department stores under the Macy's and Bloomingdale's banners, emphasizing fashion, cosmetics, and home furnishings with growing digital integration. During recent market activity, shares have displayed relative resilience while the company prepares to release Q1 2026 results in early June. Over the past month, the stock posted gains exceeding 11%, outperforming the broader retail wholesale sector which saw declines. Daily price movements remained mixed but generally aligned with or slightly trailed major indices on select sessions, reflecting a more measured response to prevailing consumer environment conditions compared to peers.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron maintains a curated section called Trending AI Robots that highlights select AI trading bots from its extensive library of hundreds of automated strategies. These bots cover thousands of tickers across equities, with only the highest-performing and most adaptable ones featured based on current market conditions. Available bots exhibit a wide range of performance metrics, including varying win rates, profit factors, maximum drawdowns, and average trade durations, alongside distinct styles such as trend-following, mean-reversion, or breakout approaches. Users can review detailed statistics for each bot to identify alignment with specific risk tolerances and timeframes. For further exploration of these AI-driven trading tools, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Kohl's (KSS) and Macy's (M) share core exposure to the department store retail sector, with business models centered on physical stores supplemented by e-commerce channels. Growth drivers for both include private-label expansion and operational efficiency initiatives, though recent momentum diverged following Kohl's earnings beat versus Macy's pre-earnings period. Risk factors encompass similar sensitivities to discretionary spending, inventory management, and competitive pressures from online retailers. Market sentiment around Kohl's (KSS) strengthened on positive comparable sales data, while Macy's (M) benefited from steadier price action amid sector softness. Valuation metrics and balance sheet considerations present trade-offs, with Kohl's (KSS) showing higher short-term volatility potential and Macy's (M) reflecting a more consolidated positioning.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including recent earnings consistency at Kohl's (KSS) and relative price stability at Macy's (M), Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a probabilistic edge to Macy's (M) for balanced positioning in the near term. The assessment draws from trend continuity metrics and sector-relative performance rather than isolated catalysts, with outcomes remaining subject to forthcoming earnings data and broader market dynamics.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
KSS vs. M commentary
Jun 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KSS is a StrongBuy and M is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 11, 2026
Stock price -- (KSS: $15.87 vs. M: $23.16)
Brand notoriety: KSS and M are both notable
Both companies represent the Department Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KSS: 104% vs. M: 129%
Market capitalization -- KSS: $1.8B vs. M: $6.09B
KSS [@Department Stores] is valued at $1.8B. M’s [@Department Stores] market capitalization is $6.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Department Stores] industry ranges from $12.34T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Department Stores] industry is $4.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KSS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KSS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • M’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, M is a better buy in the long-term than KSS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KSS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while M’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KSS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • M’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both KSS and M are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

KSS (@Department Stores) experienced а +3.06% price change this week, while M (@Department Stores) price change was +6.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

KSS is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2026.

M is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Department Stores (+1.10% weekly)

A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
M($6.09B) has a higher market cap than KSS($1.8B). M has higher P/E ratio than KSS: M (9.57) vs KSS (6.67). M YTD gains are higher at: 6.219 vs. KSS (-20.854). M has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.85B vs. KSS (1.31B). M has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. KSS (543M). M has less debt than KSS: M (5.11B) vs KSS (6.63B). M has higher revenues than KSS: M (22.7B) vs KSS (15.5B).
KSSMKSS / M
Capitalization1.8B6.09B30%
EBITDA1.31B1.85B71%
Gain YTD-20.8546.219-335%
P/E Ratio6.679.5770%
Revenue15.5B22.7B68%
Total Cash543M1.29B42%
Total Debt6.63B5.11B130%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KSS vs M: Fundamental Ratings
KSS
M
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1833
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10071
SMR RATING
1..100
8160
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4339
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7318
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KSS's Valuation (18) in the Department Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for M (89). This means that KSS’s stock grew significantly faster than M’s over the last 12 months.

M's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the Department Stores industry is in the same range as KSS (100). This means that M’s stock grew similarly to KSS’s over the last 12 months.

M's SMR Rating (60) in the Department Stores industry is in the same range as KSS (81). This means that M’s stock grew similarly to KSS’s over the last 12 months.

M's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Department Stores industry is in the same range as KSS (43). This means that M’s stock grew similarly to KSS’s over the last 12 months.

M's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Department Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KSS (73). This means that M’s stock grew somewhat faster than KSS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KSSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KSS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
M
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RINF32.69-0.03
-0.11%
ProShares Inflation Expectations
HYBI48.76-0.18
-0.38%
NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF
EWS28.53-0.34
-1.18%
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF
IEMG78.62-1.42
-1.77%
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
GDMN72.61-6.66
-8.40%
WisdomTree Efcnt Gld Pls Gld Ms Stgy ETF

KSS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KSS has been loosely correlated with M. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KSS jumps, then M could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KSS
1D Price
Change %
KSS100%
-0.35%
M - KSS
54%
Loosely correlated
+4.42%
DDS - KSS
49%
Loosely correlated
-4.37%
DDT - KSS
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
PLBL - KSS
-3%
Poorly correlated
+16.75%