KSSRF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
2.74M
KTGDF
Price
$0.26
Change
+$0.01 (+4.17%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
37.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KSSRF vs KTGDF

Header iconKSSRF vs KTGDF Comparison
Open Charts KSSRF vs KTGDFBanner chart's image
Kesselrun Resources
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization2.74M
K2 Gold
Price$0.26
Change+$0.01 (+4.17%)
Volume$4.25K
Capitalization37.31M
KSSRF vs KTGDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KSSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KTGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KSSRF vs. KTGDF commentary
Aug 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KSSRF is a Hold and KTGDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 10, 2025
Stock price -- (KSSRF: $0.03 vs. KTGDF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: KSSRF and KTGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KSSRF: 6% vs. KTGDF: 9%
Market capitalization -- KSSRF: $2.74M vs. KTGDF: $37.31M
KSSRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.74M. KTGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $37.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KSSRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKTGDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KSSRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KTGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KTGDF is a better buy in the long-term than KSSRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KSSRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KTGDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KSSRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • KTGDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KTGDF is a better buy in the short-term than KSSRF.

Price Growth

KSSRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -16.09% price change this week, while KTGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4660.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.72% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KTGDF($37.3M) has a higher market cap than KSSRF($2.74M). KTGDF YTD gains are higher at: 194.798 vs. KSSRF (17.034). KSSRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -606.73K vs. KTGDF (-959.92K). KTGDF has more cash in the bank: 2.95M vs. KSSRF (582K). KTGDF has less debt than KSSRF: KTGDF (22K) vs KSSRF (145K). KSSRF (0) and KTGDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
KSSRFKTGDFKSSRF / KTGDF
Capitalization2.74M37.3M7%
EBITDA-606.73K-959.92K63%
Gain YTD17.034194.7989%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash582K2.95M20%
Total Debt145K22K659%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KSSRF vs KTGDF: Fundamental Ratings
KSSRF
KTGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9292
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5835
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5048

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KTGDF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KSSRF (92). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

KTGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KSSRF (100). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew similarly to KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

KTGDF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as KSSRF (92). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew similarly to KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

KTGDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as KSSRF (58). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew similarly to KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

KSSRF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KTGDF (100). This means that KSSRF’s stock grew significantly faster than KTGDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KSSRFKTGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KSSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KTGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LEDS1.620.10
+6.23%
SemiLEDS Corp
MNSB20.240.54
+2.74%
MainStreet Bancshares
ENTG73.14-0.29
-0.39%
Entegris
AMBC6.94-1.35
-16.28%
Ambac Financial Group

KSSRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KSSRF and STBMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KSSRF and STBMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KSSRF
1D Price
Change %
KSSRF100%
N/A
STBMF - KSSRF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOMLF - KSSRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
KOREF - KSSRF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LMEFF - KSSRF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KTGDF - KSSRF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+4.25%
More

KTGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KTGDF and CRNLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KTGDF and CRNLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KTGDF
1D Price
Change %
KTGDF100%
+4.25%
CRNLF - KTGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PAAS - KTGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
STLRF - KTGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
VGZ - KTGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMCL - KTGDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
More