KSSRF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
Dec 9 closing price
LMEFF
Price
$0.30
Change
+$0.02 (+7.14%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Ad is loading...

KSSRF vs LMEFF

Header iconKSSRF vs LMEFF Comparison
Open Charts KSSRF vs LMEFFBanner chart's image
Kesselrun Resources
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
Laurion Mineral Exploration
Price$0.30
Change+$0.02 (+7.14%)
Volume$6.83K
CapitalizationN/A
KSSRF vs LMEFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
KSSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LMEFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KSSRF vs. LMEFF commentary
Dec 21, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KSSRF is a Hold and LMEFF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 21, 2024
Stock price -- (KSSRF: $0.02 vs. LMEFF: $0.30)
Brand notoriety: KSSRF and LMEFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KSSRF: 20% vs. LMEFF: 32%
Market capitalization -- KSSRF: $2.12M vs. LMEFF: $83.36M
KSSRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.12M. LMEFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $83.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KSSRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLMEFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KSSRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LMEFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KSSRF is a better buy in the long-term than LMEFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KSSRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMEFF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KSSRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LMEFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LMEFF is a better buy in the short-term than KSSRF.

Price Growth

KSSRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LMEFF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.75%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.40% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LMEFF($83.4M) has a higher market cap than KSSRF($2.12M). LMEFF (-16.504) and KSSRF (-17.000) have similar YTD gains . KSSRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -97.26K vs. LMEFF (-3.94M). LMEFF has more cash in the bank: 7.44M vs. KSSRF (827K). LMEFF has less debt than KSSRF: LMEFF (24K) vs KSSRF (124K). KSSRF (0) and LMEFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
KSSRFLMEFFKSSRF / LMEFF
Capitalization2.12M83.4M3%
EBITDA-97.26K-3.94M2%
Gain YTD-17.000-16.504103%
P/E Ratio33.33N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash827K7.44M11%
Total Debt124K24K517%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KSSRF vs LMEFF: Fundamental Ratings
KSSRF
LMEFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2317
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10073
SMR RATING
1..100
9097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9157
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a47

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LMEFF's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as KSSRF (91). This means that LMEFF’s stock grew similarly to KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

LMEFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as KSSRF (100). This means that LMEFF’s stock grew similarly to KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

KSSRF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as LMEFF (97). This means that KSSRF’s stock grew similarly to LMEFF’s over the last 12 months.

LMEFF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KSSRF (91). This means that LMEFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

KSSRF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LMEFF (100). This means that KSSRF’s stock grew significantly faster than LMEFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KSSRFLMEFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KSSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LMEFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ELVA2.190.08
+3.79%
Electrovaya
NDRA5.510.14
+2.61%
ENDRA Life Sciences Inc
AAL16.870.23
+1.38%
American Airlines Group
TALK2.98-0.03
-1.00%
Talkspace
CEIX103.69-4.60
-4.25%
CONSOL Energy

KSSRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KSSRF and STBMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KSSRF and STBMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KSSRF
1D Price
Change %
KSSRF100%
N/A
STBMF - KSSRF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNMCF - KSSRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
LOMLF - KSSRF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KOREF - KSSRF
14%
Poorly correlated
-4.76%
LBCMF - KSSRF
3%
Poorly correlated
+5.16%
More

LMEFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LMEFF and SGLDF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LMEFF and SGLDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMEFF
1D Price
Change %
LMEFF100%
+5.08%
SGLDF - LMEFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.43%
KSSRF - LMEFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGDTF - LMEFF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.96%
KSKGF - LMEFF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-4.76%
KTGDF - LMEFF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More