KSSRF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.06M
LOMLF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
57.03M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KSSRF vs LOMLF

Header iconKSSRF vs LOMLF Comparison
Open Charts KSSRF vs LOMLFBanner chart's image
Kesselrun Resources
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$22.5K
Capitalization3.06M
Lion One Metals
Price$0.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$314.13K
Capitalization57.03M
KSSRF vs LOMLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KSSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KSSRF vs. LOMLF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KSSRF is a Hold and LOMLF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (KSSRF: $0.03 vs. LOMLF: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: KSSRF and LOMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KSSRF: 200% vs. LOMLF: 114%
Market capitalization -- KSSRF: $3.06M vs. LOMLF: $57.03M
KSSRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.06M. LOMLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $57.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KSSRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLOMLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KSSRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LOMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LOMLF is a better buy in the long-term than KSSRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KSSRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOMLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KSSRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LOMLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LOMLF is a better buy in the short-term than KSSRF.

Price Growth

KSSRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.00% price change this week, while LOMLF (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3358.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.86% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOMLF($57M) has a higher market cap than KSSRF($3.06M). KSSRF YTD gains are higher at: 14.228 vs. LOMLF (9.622). LOMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.56M vs. KSSRF (-606.73K). LOMLF has more cash in the bank: 12.9M vs. KSSRF (582K). KSSRF has less debt than LOMLF: KSSRF (145K) vs LOMLF (51.8M). LOMLF has higher revenues than KSSRF: LOMLF (51M) vs KSSRF (0).
KSSRFLOMLFKSSRF / LOMLF
Capitalization3.06M57M5%
EBITDA-606.73K3.56M-17%
Gain YTD14.2289.622148%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue051M-
Total Cash582K12.9M5%
Total Debt145K51.8M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KSSRF vs LOMLF: Fundamental Ratings
KSSRF
LOMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8610
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOMLF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KSSRF (92). This means that LOMLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

LOMLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KSSRF (100). This means that LOMLF’s stock grew similarly to KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

LOMLF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KSSRF (100). This means that LOMLF’s stock grew similarly to KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

KSSRF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as LOMLF (61). This means that KSSRF’s stock grew similarly to LOMLF’s over the last 12 months.

KSSRF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LOMLF (100). This means that KSSRF’s stock grew similarly to LOMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KSSRFLOMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KSSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PMOIF3.100.10
+3.33%
Harbour Energy Plc
NNDNF21.80N/A
N/A
Nidec Corp.
PYPTF9.39N/A
N/A
Paypoint plc
NSRCF0.31N/A
N/A
Nextsource Materials Inc.
AVFCF0.27N/A
N/A
ADVFN plc

KSSRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KSSRF and STBMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KSSRF and STBMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KSSRF
1D Price
Change %
KSSRF100%
N/A
STBMF - KSSRF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOMLF - KSSRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
KOREF - KSSRF
14%
Poorly correlated
-24.20%
LMEFF - KSSRF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KTGDF - KSSRF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-3.51%
More

LOMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMLF has been loosely correlated with HMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMLF jumps, then HMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMLF
1D Price
Change %
LOMLF100%
+0.41%
HMY - LOMLF
41%
Loosely correlated
-14.04%
KGC - LOMLF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
EGO - LOMLF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
AEM - LOMLF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
AGI - LOMLF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
More