Ad is loading...
KTCCX vs SLMCX
KTCCX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts KTCCX vs SLMCX
DWS Science and Technology C
Price$12.63
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.69B
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info A
Price$111.35
Change+$0.69 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.36B
KTCCX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KTCCX vs. SLMCX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KTCCX is a Buy and SLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. KTCCX (1.69B). KTCCX (0.00) and SLMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . KTCCX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: KTCCX (31 years) vs SLMCX (42 years). KTCCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than SLMCX (1.18). SLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. KTCCX (27.00). KTCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLMCX: KTCCX (1000) vs SLMCX (2000). SLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.98 vs. KTCCX (-13.95). SLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.88 vs. KTCCX (-18.12).
| KTCCX | SLMCX | KTCCX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.18 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.18 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.462 | -11.052 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.69B | 12.4B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.95 | -7.98 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.09 | 10.82 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.12 | 44.88 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.58 | 85.92 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...