Ad is loading...
KTCCX vs SLMCX
KTCCX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts KTCCX vs SLMCX
DWS Science and Technology C
Price$11.36
Change-$0.32 (-2.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.56B
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info A
Price$100.07
Change-$2.82 (-2.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.51B
KTCCX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KTCCX vs. SLMCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KTCCX is a Buy and SLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. KTCCX (1.56B). KTCCX (0.00) and SLMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . KTCCX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: KTCCX (31 years) vs SLMCX (42 years). KTCCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than SLMCX (1.18). SLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. KTCCX (27.00). KTCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLMCX: KTCCX (1000) vs SLMCX (2000). SLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.31 vs. KTCCX (-19.67). SLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 43.58 vs. KTCCX (-19.39).
| KTCCX | SLMCX | KTCCX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.18 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.18 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.557 | -17.298 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 11.5B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.67 | -12.31 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.29 | -3.99 | 558% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.39 | 43.58 | -44% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.25 | 77.09 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...