KTGDF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
LMEFF
Price
$0.30
Change
+$0.02 (+7.14%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Ad is loading...

KTGDF vs LMEFF

Header iconKTGDF vs LMEFF Comparison
Open Charts KTGDF vs LMEFFBanner chart's image
K2 Gold
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
Laurion Mineral Exploration
Price$0.30
Change+$0.02 (+7.14%)
Volume$6.83K
CapitalizationN/A
KTGDF vs LMEFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
KTGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LMEFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KTGDF vs. LMEFF commentary
Dec 21, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KTGDF is a Hold and LMEFF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 21, 2024
Stock price -- (KTGDF: $0.09 vs. LMEFF: $0.30)
Brand notoriety: KTGDF and LMEFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KTGDF: 2% vs. LMEFF: 32%
Market capitalization -- KTGDF: $10.39M vs. LMEFF: $83.36M
KTGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $10.39M. LMEFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $83.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KTGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLMEFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KTGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LMEFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KTGDF is a better buy in the long-term than LMEFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KTGDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMEFF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KTGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • LMEFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LMEFF is a better buy in the short-term than KTGDF.

Price Growth

KTGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.31% price change this week, while LMEFF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.75%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.40% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LMEFF($83.4M) has a higher market cap than KTGDF($10.4M). KTGDF YTD gains are higher at: 38.065 vs. LMEFF (-16.504). KTGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.33M vs. LMEFF (-3.94M). LMEFF has more cash in the bank: 7.44M vs. KTGDF (2.87M). LMEFF has less debt than KTGDF: LMEFF (24K) vs KTGDF (40K). KTGDF (0) and LMEFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
KTGDFLMEFFKTGDF / LMEFF
Capitalization10.4M83.4M12%
EBITDA-1.33M-3.94M34%
Gain YTD38.065-16.504-231%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.87M7.44M39%
Total Debt40K24K167%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KTGDF vs LMEFF: Fundamental Ratings
KTGDF
LMEFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2417
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10073
SMR RATING
1..100
9097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4157
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5047

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KTGDF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LMEFF (72). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LMEFF’s over the last 12 months.

LMEFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as KTGDF (100). This means that LMEFF’s stock grew similarly to KTGDF’s over the last 12 months.

KTGDF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as LMEFF (97). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew similarly to LMEFF’s over the last 12 months.

KTGDF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as LMEFF (57). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew similarly to LMEFF’s over the last 12 months.

KTGDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LMEFF (100). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew similarly to LMEFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KTGDFLMEFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KTGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LMEFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ELVA2.190.08
+3.79%
Electrovaya
NDRA5.510.14
+2.61%
ENDRA Life Sciences Inc
AAL16.870.23
+1.38%
American Airlines Group
TALK2.98-0.03
-1.00%
Talkspace
CEIX103.69-4.60
-4.25%
CONSOL Energy

KTGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KTGDF and CRNLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KTGDF and CRNLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KTGDF
1D Price
Change %
KTGDF100%
N/A
CRNLF - KTGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PAAS - KTGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
BKRRF - KTGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.37%
KUYAF - KTGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
STLRF - KTGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.05%
More

LMEFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LMEFF and SGLDF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LMEFF and SGLDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMEFF
1D Price
Change %
LMEFF100%
+5.08%
SGLDF - LMEFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.43%
KSSRF - LMEFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGDTF - LMEFF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.96%
KSKGF - LMEFF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-4.76%
KTGDF - LMEFF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More