KTGDF
Price
$0.31
Change
+$0.01 (+3.33%)
Updated
Oct 20 closing price
Capitalization
48.55M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
LMEFF
Price
$0.28
Change
-$0.01 (-3.45%)
Updated
Oct 20 closing price
Capitalization
75.23M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KTGDF vs LMEFF

Header iconKTGDF vs LMEFF Comparison
Open Charts KTGDF vs LMEFFBanner chart's image
K2 Gold
Price$0.31
Change+$0.01 (+3.33%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization48.55M
Laurion Mineral Exploration
Price$0.28
Change-$0.01 (-3.45%)
Volume$6.64K
Capitalization75.23M
KTGDF vs LMEFF Comparison Chart in %
KTGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LMEFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KTGDF vs. LMEFF commentary
Oct 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KTGDF is a Hold and LMEFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 21, 2025
Stock price -- (KTGDF: $0.31 vs. LMEFF: $0.28)
Brand notoriety: KTGDF and LMEFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KTGDF: 4% vs. LMEFF: 34%
Market capitalization -- KTGDF: $48.55M vs. LMEFF: $75.23M
KTGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $48.55M. LMEFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $75.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $110.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KTGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLMEFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KTGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LMEFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KTGDF is a better buy in the long-term than LMEFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KTGDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMEFF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KTGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LMEFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LMEFF is a better buy in the short-term than KTGDF.

Price Growth

KTGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -17.00% price change this week, while LMEFF (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4593.86%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-2.02% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LMEFF($75.2M) has a higher market cap than KTGDF($48.6M). KTGDF YTD gains are higher at: 253.121 vs. LMEFF (-3.979). KTGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.06M vs. LMEFF (-3.53M). LMEFF has more cash in the bank: 5.72M vs. KTGDF (919K). KTGDF (0) and LMEFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
KTGDFLMEFFKTGDF / LMEFF
Capitalization48.6M75.2M65%
EBITDA-1.06M-3.53M30%
Gain YTD253.121-3.979-6,361%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash919K5.72M16%
Total Debt22KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KTGDF vs LMEFF: Fundamental Ratings
KTGDF
LMEFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7569
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10084
SMR RATING
1..100
9497
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3749
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KTGDF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as LMEFF (67). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew similarly to LMEFF’s over the last 12 months.

LMEFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as KTGDF (100). This means that LMEFF’s stock grew similarly to KTGDF’s over the last 12 months.

KTGDF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as LMEFF (97). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew similarly to LMEFF’s over the last 12 months.

KTGDF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as LMEFF (49). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew similarly to LMEFF’s over the last 12 months.

KTGDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LMEFF (100). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew similarly to LMEFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KTGDFLMEFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KTGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LMEFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RPMT0.370.01
+2.04%
Rego Payment Architectures, Inc.
KAOOY8.390.04
+0.48%
Kao Corp.
BOTRF0.16N/A
N/A
China Everbright Water Ltd.
JFROF11.10N/A
N/A
J. Front Retailing Co., Ltd.
SSUP0.08N/A
-4.25%
Superior Industries International, Inc.

KTGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KTGDF and CRNLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KTGDF and CRNLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KTGDF
1D Price
Change %
KTGDF100%
+2.00%
CRNLF - KTGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
+7.89%
PAAS - KTGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.45%
STLRF - KTGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
VGZ - KTGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
CMCL - KTGDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.28%
More

LMEFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LMEFF and KSSRF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LMEFF and KSSRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMEFF
1D Price
Change %
LMEFF100%
-3.66%
KSSRF - LMEFF
7%
Poorly correlated
-6.00%
LGDTF - LMEFF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
KSKGF - LMEFF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-7.41%
KTGDF - LMEFF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%