KTGDF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
10.39M
STLRF
Price
$0.60
Change
+$0.01 (+1.69%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

KTGDF vs STLRF

Header iconKTGDF vs STLRF Comparison
Open Charts KTGDF vs STLRFBanner chart's image
K2 Gold
Price$0.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.42K
Capitalization10.39M
STLLR GOLD
Price$0.60
Change+$0.01 (+1.69%)
Volume$2.5K
CapitalizationN/A
KTGDF vs STLRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KTGDF vs. STLRF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KTGDF is a Hold and STLRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (KTGDF: $0.25 vs. STLRF: $0.60)
Brand notoriety: KTGDF and STLRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KTGDF: 16% vs. STLRF: 8%
Market capitalization -- KTGDF: $10.39M vs. STLRF: $0
KTGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $10.39M. STLRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KTGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTLRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KTGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STLRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KTGDF is a better buy in the long-term than STLRF.

Price Growth

KTGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.17% price change this week, while STLRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

STLRF is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.62% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KTGDF YTD gains are higher at: 185.202 vs. STLRF (4.426).
KTGDFSTLRFKTGDF / STLRF
Capitalization10.4MN/A-
EBITDA-1.33MN/A-
Gain YTD185.2024.4264,185%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash2.87MN/A-
Total Debt40KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KTGDF vs STLRF: Fundamental Ratings
KTGDF
STLRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8659
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9194
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STLRF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is in the same range as KTGDF (42). This means that STLRF’s stock grew similarly to KTGDF’s over the last 12 months.

STLRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KTGDF (100). This means that STLRF’s stock grew similarly to KTGDF’s over the last 12 months.

KTGDF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as STLRF (94). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

KTGDF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as STLRF (61). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

KTGDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as STLRF (100). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JSVTX14.970.21
+1.42%
Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value T
MCVAX10.90N/A
N/A
Transamerica Mid Cap Value Opps A
FFEFX14.83N/A
N/A
Nuveen Dividend Value R6
BIREX14.92N/A
N/A
BlackRock Real Estate Securities Instl
FLCNX34.09N/A
N/A
Fidelity Contrafund K6

KTGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KTGDF and CRNLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KTGDF and CRNLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KTGDF
1D Price
Change %
KTGDF100%
-1.40%
CRNLF - KTGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PAAS - KTGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
BKRRF - KTGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+10.26%
KUYAF - KTGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.19%
STLRF - KTGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
More

STLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STLRF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STLRF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STLRF
1D Price
Change %
STLRF100%
+1.40%
PAAS - STLRF
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
AGI - STLRF
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
AU - STLRF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
HL - STLRF
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.92%
SAND - STLRF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
More