KTGDF
Price
$0.32
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
50.49M
STLRF
Price
$1.13
Change
+$0.09 (+8.65%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
135.97M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KTGDF vs STLRF

Header iconKTGDF vs STLRF Comparison
Open Charts KTGDF vs STLRFBanner chart's image
K2 Gold
Price$0.32
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7K
Capitalization50.49M
STLLR GOLD
Price$1.13
Change+$0.09 (+8.65%)
Volume$171.48K
Capitalization135.97M
KTGDF vs STLRF Comparison Chart in %
KTGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KTGDF vs. STLRF commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KTGDF is a StrongBuy and STLRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (KTGDF: $0.32 vs. STLRF: $1.10)
Brand notoriety: KTGDF and STLRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KTGDF: 21% vs. STLRF: 278%
Market capitalization -- KTGDF: $50.49M vs. STLRF: $135.97M
KTGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $50.49M. STLRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $135.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $111.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KTGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTLRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KTGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STLRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both KTGDF and STLRF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KTGDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STLRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KTGDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STLRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both KTGDF and STLRF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

KTGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.96% price change this week, while STLRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2313.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.42% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STLRF($136M) has a higher market cap than KTGDF($50.5M). KTGDF YTD gains are higher at: 270.058 vs. STLRF (91.288). KTGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.06M vs. STLRF (-33.09M). STLRF has more cash in the bank: 15.9M vs. KTGDF (919K). KTGDF has less debt than STLRF: KTGDF (22K) vs STLRF (1.2M). KTGDF (0) and STLRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
KTGDFSTLRFKTGDF / STLRF
Capitalization50.5M136M37%
EBITDA-1.06M-33.09M3%
Gain YTD270.05891.288296%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash919K15.9M6%
Total Debt22K1.2M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KTGDF vs STLRF: Fundamental Ratings
KTGDF
STLRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6373
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9496
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3639
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2833

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STLRF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as KTGDF (45). This means that STLRF’s stock grew similarly to KTGDF’s over the last 12 months.

STLRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KTGDF (100). This means that STLRF’s stock grew similarly to KTGDF’s over the last 12 months.

KTGDF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as STLRF (96). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

KTGDF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as STLRF (39). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

KTGDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as STLRF (100). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KTGDFSTLRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KTGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLEV1.15N/A
N/A
Concrete Leveling Systems Inc.
NVAAF0.39N/A
N/A
Nova Minerals Ltd.
HUPHY4.55N/A
N/A
Hutchison Port Holdings Trust
LTRCF3.64N/A
N/A
LOTTERY CORP LTD
CIHKY29.73-0.20
-0.67%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.

STLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STLRF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STLRF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STLRF
1D Price
Change %
STLRF100%
-2.65%
PAAS - STLRF
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
AGI - STLRF
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.48%
AU - STLRF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
SAND - STLRF
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.75%
RGLD - STLRF
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.74%
More