KULR
Price
$0.87
Change
+$0.01 (+1.16%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
2.12B
58 days until earnings call
MNBEF
Price
$14.05
Change
-$0.14 (-0.99%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
5.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

KULR vs MNBEF

Header iconKULR vs MNBEF Comparison
Open Charts KULR vs MNBEFBanner chart's image
KULR Technology Group
Price$0.87
Change+$0.01 (+1.16%)
Volume$20.5M
Capitalization2.12B
Minebea Mitsumi
Price$14.05
Change-$0.14 (-0.99%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.53B
KULR vs MNBEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KULR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KULR vs. MNBEF commentary
Jun 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KULR is a Hold and MNBEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 21, 2025
Stock price -- (KULR: $0.87 vs. MNBEF: $14.05)
Brand notoriety: KULR and MNBEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KULR: 144% vs. MNBEF: 80%
Market capitalization -- KULR: $2.12B vs. MNBEF: $5.53B
KULR [@Electronic Components] is valued at $2.12B. MNBEF’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $5.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $113.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KULR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNBEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KULR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MNBEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNBEF is a better buy in the long-term than KULR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KULR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • KULR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

KULR (@Electronic Components) experienced а -24.76% price change this week, while MNBEF (@Electronic Components) price change was -0.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

KULR is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.58% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNBEF($5.53B) has a higher market cap than KULR($2.12B). MNBEF YTD gains are higher at: -12.187 vs. KULR (-75.625). MNBEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 158B vs. KULR (-28.75M). MNBEF has more cash in the bank: 168B vs. KULR (24.4M). KULR has less debt than MNBEF: KULR (1.19M) vs MNBEF (419B). MNBEF has higher revenues than KULR: MNBEF (1.51T) vs KULR (11.4M).
KULRMNBEFKULR / MNBEF
Capitalization2.12B5.53B38%
EBITDA-28.75M158B-0%
Gain YTD-75.625-12.187621%
P/E RatioN/A13.80-
Revenue11.4M1.51T0%
Total Cash24.4M168B0%
Total Debt1.19M419B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KULR vs MNBEF: Fundamental Ratings
KULR
MNBEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6296
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
98100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6577
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10087
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNBEF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KULR (85). This means that MNBEF’s stock grew significantly faster than KULR’s over the last 12 months.

MNBEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KULR (100). This means that MNBEF’s stock grew similarly to KULR’s over the last 12 months.

KULR's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as MNBEF (100). This means that KULR’s stock grew similarly to MNBEF’s over the last 12 months.

KULR's Price Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as MNBEF (77). This means that KULR’s stock grew similarly to MNBEF’s over the last 12 months.

MNBEF's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as KULR (100). This means that MNBEF’s stock grew similarly to KULR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KULR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KULR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UOPIX114.32N/A
N/A
ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Inv
DIECX43.58N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon International Core Equity C
OLGCX50.99N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth C
DUSLX39.37-0.16
-0.40%
DFA US Large Cap Growth Instl
EMRIX15.63-0.07
-0.45%
VanEck Emerging Markets I

KULR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KULR and OUST have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KULR and OUST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KULR
1D Price
Change %
KULR100%
+0.65%
OUST - KULR
31%
Poorly correlated
+5.85%
JBL - KULR
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
MTEK - KULR
26%
Poorly correlated
+16.38%
VICR - KULR
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.25%
FLEX - KULR
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
More

MNBEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNBEF and AITUY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNBEF and AITUY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNBEF
1D Price
Change %
MNBEF100%
N/A
AITUY - MNBEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRSEF - MNBEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IEHC - MNBEF
5%
Poorly correlated
+25.71%
KULR - MNBEF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
JNNDF - MNBEF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More