KULR
Price
$1.28
Change
+$0.02 (+1.59%)
Updated
Apr 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
301.49M
47 days until earnings call
MNBEF
Price
$14.69
Change
-$1.26 (-7.90%)
Updated
Mar 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.83B
Ad is loading...

KULR vs MNBEF

Header iconKULR vs MNBEF Comparison
Open Charts KULR vs MNBEFBanner chart's image
KULR Technology Group
Price$1.28
Change+$0.02 (+1.59%)
Volume$49.14K
Capitalization301.49M
Minebea Mitsumi
Price$14.69
Change-$1.26 (-7.90%)
Volume$200
Capitalization5.83B
KULR vs MNBEF Comparison Chart
Loading...
KULR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KULR vs. MNBEF commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KULR is a Hold and MNBEF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (KULR: $1.26 vs. MNBEF: $14.69)
Brand notoriety: KULR and MNBEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KULR: 78% vs. MNBEF: 37%
Market capitalization -- KULR: $301.49M vs. MNBEF: $5.81B
KULR [@Electronic Components] is valued at $301.49M. MNBEF’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $5.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $82.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $5.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KULR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNBEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KULR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MNBEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both KULR and MNBEF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KULR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • KULR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

KULR (@Electronic Components) experienced а -26.32% price change this week, while MNBEF (@Electronic Components) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -3.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

KULR is expected to report earnings on May 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-3.58% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNBEF($5.83B) has a higher market cap than KULR($301M). MNBEF YTD gains are higher at: -8.188 vs. KULR (-64.507). MNBEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 158B vs. KULR (-14.49M). MNBEF has more cash in the bank: 168B vs. KULR (912K). KULR has less debt than MNBEF: KULR (2.7M) vs MNBEF (419B). MNBEF has higher revenues than KULR: MNBEF (1.51T) vs KULR (9.7M).
KULRMNBEFKULR / MNBEF
Capitalization301M5.83B5%
EBITDA-14.49M158B-0%
Gain YTD-64.507-8.188788%
P/E RatioN/A14.06-
Revenue9.7M1.51T0%
Total Cash912K168B0%
Total Debt2.7M419B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KULR vs MNBEF: Fundamental Ratings
KULR
MNBEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1198
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3577
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10068
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNBEF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KULR (72). This means that MNBEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KULR’s over the last 12 months.

KULR's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as MNBEF (100). This means that KULR’s stock grew similarly to MNBEF’s over the last 12 months.

KULR's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MNBEF (100). This means that KULR’s stock grew similarly to MNBEF’s over the last 12 months.

KULR's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNBEF (77). This means that KULR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNBEF’s over the last 12 months.

MNBEF's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as KULR (100). This means that MNBEF’s stock grew similarly to KULR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KULR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KULR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRGHX48.270.14
+0.29%
MFS Core Equity R3
BRZKX11.950.02
+0.17%
BlackRock Sus Adg Intl Eq K
BRGNX35.84N/A
N/A
iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Idx Instl
WLCVX21.07N/A
N/A
Wilshire Large Company Value Instl
IPETX6.16N/A
N/A
Voya Large Cap Value Port S2

KULR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KULR and JBL have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KULR and JBL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KULR
1D Price
Change %
KULR100%
-4.55%
JBL - KULR
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
APH - KULR
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
MTEK - KULR
23%
Poorly correlated
-7.63%
OUST - KULR
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.67%
PLXS - KULR
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
More

MNBEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNBEF and AITUY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNBEF and AITUY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNBEF
1D Price
Change %
MNBEF100%
N/A
AITUY - MNBEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRSEF - MNBEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IEHC - MNBEF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KULR - MNBEF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.55%
JNNDF - MNBEF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More