KUMBF
Price
$24.05
Change
+$0.53 (+2.25%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
MAANF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

KUMBF vs MAANF

Header iconKUMBF vs MAANF Comparison
Open Charts KUMBF vs MAANFBanner chart's image
Kumba Iron Ore
Price$24.05
Change+$0.53 (+2.25%)
Volume$124
CapitalizationN/A
Maanshan Iron & Steel
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
KUMBF vs MAANF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MAANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KUMBF vs. MAANF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KUMBF is a Buy and MAANF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (KUMBF: $24.05 vs. MAANF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: KUMBF and MAANF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KUMBF: 100% vs. MAANF: 20%
Market capitalization -- KUMBF: $5.91B vs. MAANF: $2.72B
KUMBF [@Steel] is valued at $5.91B. MAANF’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $2.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $28.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $4.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KUMBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAANF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KUMBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MAANF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KUMBF is a better buy in the long-term than MAANF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAANF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MAANF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

KUMBF (@Steel) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MAANF (@Steel) price change was -2.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was -5.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (-5.22% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KUMBF($5.91B) has a higher market cap than MAANF($2.72B). MAANF YTD gains are higher at: 21.429 vs. KUMBF (5.553). KUMBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 36.9B vs. MAANF (-1.88B). KUMBF has more cash in the bank: 13.9B vs. MAANF (6.91B). KUMBF has less debt than MAANF: KUMBF (1.26B) vs MAANF (21.8B). MAANF (86.5B) and KUMBF (83.8B) have equivalent revenues.
KUMBFMAANFKUMBF / MAANF
Capitalization5.91B2.72B217%
EBITDA36.9B-1.88B-1,964%
Gain YTD5.55321.42926%
P/E Ratio6.70N/A-
Revenue83.8B86.5B97%
Total Cash13.9B6.91B201%
Total Debt1.26B21.8B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KUMBF vs MAANF: Fundamental Ratings
KUMBF
MAANF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4490
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57100
SMR RATING
1..100
1291
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5440
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4698
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAANF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as KUMBF (2). This means that MAANF’s stock grew similarly to KUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

KUMBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAANF (100). This means that KUMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAANF’s over the last 12 months.

KUMBF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAANF (91). This means that KUMBF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAANF’s over the last 12 months.

MAANF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as KUMBF (54). This means that MAANF’s stock grew similarly to KUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

KUMBF's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAANF (98). This means that KUMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAANF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KUMBFMAANF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
12%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MAANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSUIX23.11N/A
N/A
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure I
ECOAX8.88-0.14
-1.55%
Ecofin Global Renewables Infras A
MGQAX16.30-0.40
-2.40%
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Stars A
HDGRX33.90-0.85
-2.45%
Hartford Dividend and Growth R3
APHRX33.24-0.97
-2.84%
Artisan Global Opportunities Instl

KUMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KUMBF and ICHBF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KUMBF and ICHBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KUMBF
1D Price
Change %
KUMBF100%
N/A
ICHBF - KUMBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KLKNF - KUMBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTGRF - KUMBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTGRY - KUMBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAANF - KUMBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MAANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAANF and ZKIN have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAANF and ZKIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAANF
1D Price
Change %
MAANF100%
N/A
ZKIN - MAANF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.49%
STLD - MAANF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
NUE - MAANF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.50%
RS - MAANF
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.14%
MTGRY - MAANF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More