Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KURE vs MCHI
KURE vs MCHI Comparison
Open Charts KURE vs MCHI
KraneShares MSCI All China Hlth Care ETF
Price$18.94
Change-$0.48 (-2.47%)
Volume$130
Net Assets95.31M
iShares MSCI China ETF
Price$61.91
Change-$0.51 (-0.82%)
Volume$16.46K
Net Assets8.08B
KURE vs MCHI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KURE vs. MCHI commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KURE is a Hold and MCHI is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHI has more net assets: 8.08B vs. KURE (95.3M). KURE has a higher annual dividend yield than MCHI: KURE (36.850) vs MCHI (34.521). KURE was incepted earlier than MCHI: KURE (8 years) vs MCHI (15 years). MCHI (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than KURE (0.65). KURE has a higher turnover MCHI (15.00) vs MCHI (15.00).
| KURE | MCHI | KURE / MCHI | |
| Gain YTD | 36.850 | 34.521 | 107% |
| Net Assets | 95.3M | 8.08B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.59 | 110% |
| Turnover | 77.00 | 15.00 | 513% |
| Yield | 0.95 | 2.24 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| KURE | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 14 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
KURE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KURE and LEGN have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KURE and LEGN's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KURE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KURE | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| LEGN - KURE | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
| BNR - KURE | 2% Poorly correlated | -6.15% | ||
| HCM - KURE | -2% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
| ONC - KURE | -2% Poorly correlated | -3.37% | ||
| ZLAB - KURE | -6% Poorly correlated | -2.15% |
MCHI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHI has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCHI jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHI | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| BABA - MCHI | 87% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| JD - MCHI | 82% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| BILI - MCHI | 81% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| BIDU - MCHI | 77% Closely correlated | +2.66% | ||
| KC - MCHI | 76% Closely correlated | +1.97% | ||
More | ||||